How do you know you have reached North or South Pole without GPS?












34















Having read about the resent foot traverse of Antarctica by Colin O'Brady I was wondering which means the polar explorers of former, pre-GPS times did use to determine that they hat reached North or South Pole. Obviously, you cannot use a compass since it would guide you to magnetic north or south and not to the pole itself.



So what means have they been using or (to make it a bit more open) could they have used?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Related How much distance is there between True North and Magnetic North Poles? & When is the best time of year to find the North Pole? & Calculate true north with a compass and map

    – James Jenkins
    yesterday






  • 5





    North Pole: ask Santa's elves. South Pole: not sure.

    – David Richerby
    19 hours ago











  • Same question on Astronomy.SE: How would I measure that I'm at a pole?

    – dotancohen
    6 hours ago
















34















Having read about the resent foot traverse of Antarctica by Colin O'Brady I was wondering which means the polar explorers of former, pre-GPS times did use to determine that they hat reached North or South Pole. Obviously, you cannot use a compass since it would guide you to magnetic north or south and not to the pole itself.



So what means have they been using or (to make it a bit more open) could they have used?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Related How much distance is there between True North and Magnetic North Poles? & When is the best time of year to find the North Pole? & Calculate true north with a compass and map

    – James Jenkins
    yesterday






  • 5





    North Pole: ask Santa's elves. South Pole: not sure.

    – David Richerby
    19 hours ago











  • Same question on Astronomy.SE: How would I measure that I'm at a pole?

    – dotancohen
    6 hours ago














34












34








34


4






Having read about the resent foot traverse of Antarctica by Colin O'Brady I was wondering which means the polar explorers of former, pre-GPS times did use to determine that they hat reached North or South Pole. Obviously, you cannot use a compass since it would guide you to magnetic north or south and not to the pole itself.



So what means have they been using or (to make it a bit more open) could they have used?










share|improve this question
















Having read about the resent foot traverse of Antarctica by Colin O'Brady I was wondering which means the polar explorers of former, pre-GPS times did use to determine that they hat reached North or South Pole. Obviously, you cannot use a compass since it would guide you to magnetic north or south and not to the pole itself.



So what means have they been using or (to make it a bit more open) could they have used?







navigation history






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Charlie Brumbaugh

46.3k16130258




46.3k16130258










asked yesterday









Benedikt BauerBenedikt Bauer

6,52512754




6,52512754








  • 1





    Related How much distance is there between True North and Magnetic North Poles? & When is the best time of year to find the North Pole? & Calculate true north with a compass and map

    – James Jenkins
    yesterday






  • 5





    North Pole: ask Santa's elves. South Pole: not sure.

    – David Richerby
    19 hours ago











  • Same question on Astronomy.SE: How would I measure that I'm at a pole?

    – dotancohen
    6 hours ago














  • 1





    Related How much distance is there between True North and Magnetic North Poles? & When is the best time of year to find the North Pole? & Calculate true north with a compass and map

    – James Jenkins
    yesterday






  • 5





    North Pole: ask Santa's elves. South Pole: not sure.

    – David Richerby
    19 hours ago











  • Same question on Astronomy.SE: How would I measure that I'm at a pole?

    – dotancohen
    6 hours ago








1




1





Related How much distance is there between True North and Magnetic North Poles? & When is the best time of year to find the North Pole? & Calculate true north with a compass and map

– James Jenkins
yesterday





Related How much distance is there between True North and Magnetic North Poles? & When is the best time of year to find the North Pole? & Calculate true north with a compass and map

– James Jenkins
yesterday




5




5





North Pole: ask Santa's elves. South Pole: not sure.

– David Richerby
19 hours ago





North Pole: ask Santa's elves. South Pole: not sure.

– David Richerby
19 hours ago













Same question on Astronomy.SE: How would I measure that I'm at a pole?

– dotancohen
6 hours ago





Same question on Astronomy.SE: How would I measure that I'm at a pole?

– dotancohen
6 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















24














I'll expand a bit on how one would use a sextant to locate the north pole.



The basic arrangement needs a horizontal reflective plane, for which Amundsen used a pool of mercury. A precisely weighted mirror could work also, but a pool of mercury is more robust and doesn't go out of calibration. Sextant measures the angular distance between two visible objects, in this case between the sun and its reflection in the horizontal surface.



This angle is twice the elevation of sun above the horizon. If you are standing at exactly the north (or south) pole, sun will remain at the same elevation all through the day. There will be a small linear change due to earth's orbit around the sun, but no cyclic 24-hour change because you are on the earths rotational axis.



Now, you can take multiple measurements over the day and draw a graph. Even though sun remains at the same elevation, it will still move in a circle around you, so each measurement corresponds to a different direction.



If the elevation graph is flat, you have found the pole. If it however resembles a sine wave, you can use the information to move closer to the pole. The direction where the sun's elevation is lowest is north, and the distance to the true north pole can be calculated from the difference between lowest and highest elevation.






share|improve this answer































    32














    Amundsen's team used a meter on their sledges to get close (dead reckoning) and then sextants to confirm the position.






    Using Amundsen's diary, Roland Huntford (in The Amundsen Photographs) describes the photo as "Shooting the sun at the South Geographical Pole. Amundsen (left) is holding a sextant. Helmer Hanssen (right) is bending over the artificial horizon, which is a tray of mercury. Amundsen is lining up the direct image of the sun with its reflection in the surface of the mercury."




    Amundsen's original South Pole Station




    When their sledge meters indicated they should be at the right place, they stopped at the location marked "Sledge" on the map at right (from The South Pole) to determine their position more accurately from sun shots. Amundsen then sent three men out on sledges at 90° intervals. Each went about 10 statute miles; in this way he assured that his party had encircled the Pole.



    ...



    At Polheim the team took a series of hourly observations for a 24-hour period to confirm their location




    Amundsen's original South Pole Station




    For the next three days the men worked to fix the exact position of the pole; after the conflicting and disputed claims of Cook and Peary in the north, Amundsen wanted to leave unmistakable markers for Scott.[139] After taking several sextant readings at different times of day, Bjaaland, Wisting and Hassel skied out in different directions to "box" the pole; Amundsen reasoned that between them they would bracket the exact point.[140] Finally the party pitched a tent, which they called Polheim, as near as possible to the actual pole as they could calculate by their observations. In the tent Amundsen left equipment for Scott, and a letter addressed to King Haakon which he requested Scott to deliver




    Wikipedia



    People still use sextants today, and they are still the best way to find latitude/longitude without GPS so it seems like is what one would use.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Is it necessary to directly look into the sun using this method?

      – M.Herzkamp
      3 hours ago



















    3














    Take a time-lapse photo of the sky directly overhead at night. The moving stars will form circles in your photo, and if the center of the circles is directly overhead, you are there.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Bruce is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 11





      In theory, this would work. In practice, an error of just one second of arc in aiming your camera upwards will result in an error of more than 300 meters in position. Sextants are designed for high-precision aiming; camera tripods aren't.

      – Mark
      yesterday






    • 1





      A comment on Mark's answer (above). An arcsecond corresponds to about 100 feet at the Earth's surface, not 300 meters. But his point is perfectly valid of course.

      – Patrick Wallace
      yesterday






    • 27





      All pre-GPS expeditions tried hard to be outta there before night.

      – kubanczyk
      23 hours ago






    • 7





      To clarify kubanczyk's comment: The poles are the lands of the midnight sun. If there are any stars visible, that means it is winter; you really don't want to walk to the South Pole in winter.

      – Martin Bonner
      5 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "395"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f21454%2fhow-do-you-know-you-have-reached-north-or-south-pole-without-gps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    24














    I'll expand a bit on how one would use a sextant to locate the north pole.



    The basic arrangement needs a horizontal reflective plane, for which Amundsen used a pool of mercury. A precisely weighted mirror could work also, but a pool of mercury is more robust and doesn't go out of calibration. Sextant measures the angular distance between two visible objects, in this case between the sun and its reflection in the horizontal surface.



    This angle is twice the elevation of sun above the horizon. If you are standing at exactly the north (or south) pole, sun will remain at the same elevation all through the day. There will be a small linear change due to earth's orbit around the sun, but no cyclic 24-hour change because you are on the earths rotational axis.



    Now, you can take multiple measurements over the day and draw a graph. Even though sun remains at the same elevation, it will still move in a circle around you, so each measurement corresponds to a different direction.



    If the elevation graph is flat, you have found the pole. If it however resembles a sine wave, you can use the information to move closer to the pole. The direction where the sun's elevation is lowest is north, and the distance to the true north pole can be calculated from the difference between lowest and highest elevation.






    share|improve this answer




























      24














      I'll expand a bit on how one would use a sextant to locate the north pole.



      The basic arrangement needs a horizontal reflective plane, for which Amundsen used a pool of mercury. A precisely weighted mirror could work also, but a pool of mercury is more robust and doesn't go out of calibration. Sextant measures the angular distance between two visible objects, in this case between the sun and its reflection in the horizontal surface.



      This angle is twice the elevation of sun above the horizon. If you are standing at exactly the north (or south) pole, sun will remain at the same elevation all through the day. There will be a small linear change due to earth's orbit around the sun, but no cyclic 24-hour change because you are on the earths rotational axis.



      Now, you can take multiple measurements over the day and draw a graph. Even though sun remains at the same elevation, it will still move in a circle around you, so each measurement corresponds to a different direction.



      If the elevation graph is flat, you have found the pole. If it however resembles a sine wave, you can use the information to move closer to the pole. The direction where the sun's elevation is lowest is north, and the distance to the true north pole can be calculated from the difference between lowest and highest elevation.






      share|improve this answer


























        24












        24








        24







        I'll expand a bit on how one would use a sextant to locate the north pole.



        The basic arrangement needs a horizontal reflective plane, for which Amundsen used a pool of mercury. A precisely weighted mirror could work also, but a pool of mercury is more robust and doesn't go out of calibration. Sextant measures the angular distance between two visible objects, in this case between the sun and its reflection in the horizontal surface.



        This angle is twice the elevation of sun above the horizon. If you are standing at exactly the north (or south) pole, sun will remain at the same elevation all through the day. There will be a small linear change due to earth's orbit around the sun, but no cyclic 24-hour change because you are on the earths rotational axis.



        Now, you can take multiple measurements over the day and draw a graph. Even though sun remains at the same elevation, it will still move in a circle around you, so each measurement corresponds to a different direction.



        If the elevation graph is flat, you have found the pole. If it however resembles a sine wave, you can use the information to move closer to the pole. The direction where the sun's elevation is lowest is north, and the distance to the true north pole can be calculated from the difference between lowest and highest elevation.






        share|improve this answer













        I'll expand a bit on how one would use a sextant to locate the north pole.



        The basic arrangement needs a horizontal reflective plane, for which Amundsen used a pool of mercury. A precisely weighted mirror could work also, but a pool of mercury is more robust and doesn't go out of calibration. Sextant measures the angular distance between two visible objects, in this case between the sun and its reflection in the horizontal surface.



        This angle is twice the elevation of sun above the horizon. If you are standing at exactly the north (or south) pole, sun will remain at the same elevation all through the day. There will be a small linear change due to earth's orbit around the sun, but no cyclic 24-hour change because you are on the earths rotational axis.



        Now, you can take multiple measurements over the day and draw a graph. Even though sun remains at the same elevation, it will still move in a circle around you, so each measurement corresponds to a different direction.



        If the elevation graph is flat, you have found the pole. If it however resembles a sine wave, you can use the information to move closer to the pole. The direction where the sun's elevation is lowest is north, and the distance to the true north pole can be calculated from the difference between lowest and highest elevation.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        jpajpa

        3963




        3963























            32














            Amundsen's team used a meter on their sledges to get close (dead reckoning) and then sextants to confirm the position.






            Using Amundsen's diary, Roland Huntford (in The Amundsen Photographs) describes the photo as "Shooting the sun at the South Geographical Pole. Amundsen (left) is holding a sextant. Helmer Hanssen (right) is bending over the artificial horizon, which is a tray of mercury. Amundsen is lining up the direct image of the sun with its reflection in the surface of the mercury."




            Amundsen's original South Pole Station




            When their sledge meters indicated they should be at the right place, they stopped at the location marked "Sledge" on the map at right (from The South Pole) to determine their position more accurately from sun shots. Amundsen then sent three men out on sledges at 90° intervals. Each went about 10 statute miles; in this way he assured that his party had encircled the Pole.



            ...



            At Polheim the team took a series of hourly observations for a 24-hour period to confirm their location




            Amundsen's original South Pole Station




            For the next three days the men worked to fix the exact position of the pole; after the conflicting and disputed claims of Cook and Peary in the north, Amundsen wanted to leave unmistakable markers for Scott.[139] After taking several sextant readings at different times of day, Bjaaland, Wisting and Hassel skied out in different directions to "box" the pole; Amundsen reasoned that between them they would bracket the exact point.[140] Finally the party pitched a tent, which they called Polheim, as near as possible to the actual pole as they could calculate by their observations. In the tent Amundsen left equipment for Scott, and a letter addressed to King Haakon which he requested Scott to deliver




            Wikipedia



            People still use sextants today, and they are still the best way to find latitude/longitude without GPS so it seems like is what one would use.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              Is it necessary to directly look into the sun using this method?

              – M.Herzkamp
              3 hours ago
















            32














            Amundsen's team used a meter on their sledges to get close (dead reckoning) and then sextants to confirm the position.






            Using Amundsen's diary, Roland Huntford (in The Amundsen Photographs) describes the photo as "Shooting the sun at the South Geographical Pole. Amundsen (left) is holding a sextant. Helmer Hanssen (right) is bending over the artificial horizon, which is a tray of mercury. Amundsen is lining up the direct image of the sun with its reflection in the surface of the mercury."




            Amundsen's original South Pole Station




            When their sledge meters indicated they should be at the right place, they stopped at the location marked "Sledge" on the map at right (from The South Pole) to determine their position more accurately from sun shots. Amundsen then sent three men out on sledges at 90° intervals. Each went about 10 statute miles; in this way he assured that his party had encircled the Pole.



            ...



            At Polheim the team took a series of hourly observations for a 24-hour period to confirm their location




            Amundsen's original South Pole Station




            For the next three days the men worked to fix the exact position of the pole; after the conflicting and disputed claims of Cook and Peary in the north, Amundsen wanted to leave unmistakable markers for Scott.[139] After taking several sextant readings at different times of day, Bjaaland, Wisting and Hassel skied out in different directions to "box" the pole; Amundsen reasoned that between them they would bracket the exact point.[140] Finally the party pitched a tent, which they called Polheim, as near as possible to the actual pole as they could calculate by their observations. In the tent Amundsen left equipment for Scott, and a letter addressed to King Haakon which he requested Scott to deliver




            Wikipedia



            People still use sextants today, and they are still the best way to find latitude/longitude without GPS so it seems like is what one would use.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              Is it necessary to directly look into the sun using this method?

              – M.Herzkamp
              3 hours ago














            32












            32








            32







            Amundsen's team used a meter on their sledges to get close (dead reckoning) and then sextants to confirm the position.






            Using Amundsen's diary, Roland Huntford (in The Amundsen Photographs) describes the photo as "Shooting the sun at the South Geographical Pole. Amundsen (left) is holding a sextant. Helmer Hanssen (right) is bending over the artificial horizon, which is a tray of mercury. Amundsen is lining up the direct image of the sun with its reflection in the surface of the mercury."




            Amundsen's original South Pole Station




            When their sledge meters indicated they should be at the right place, they stopped at the location marked "Sledge" on the map at right (from The South Pole) to determine their position more accurately from sun shots. Amundsen then sent three men out on sledges at 90° intervals. Each went about 10 statute miles; in this way he assured that his party had encircled the Pole.



            ...



            At Polheim the team took a series of hourly observations for a 24-hour period to confirm their location




            Amundsen's original South Pole Station




            For the next three days the men worked to fix the exact position of the pole; after the conflicting and disputed claims of Cook and Peary in the north, Amundsen wanted to leave unmistakable markers for Scott.[139] After taking several sextant readings at different times of day, Bjaaland, Wisting and Hassel skied out in different directions to "box" the pole; Amundsen reasoned that between them they would bracket the exact point.[140] Finally the party pitched a tent, which they called Polheim, as near as possible to the actual pole as they could calculate by their observations. In the tent Amundsen left equipment for Scott, and a letter addressed to King Haakon which he requested Scott to deliver




            Wikipedia



            People still use sextants today, and they are still the best way to find latitude/longitude without GPS so it seems like is what one would use.






            share|improve this answer















            Amundsen's team used a meter on their sledges to get close (dead reckoning) and then sextants to confirm the position.






            Using Amundsen's diary, Roland Huntford (in The Amundsen Photographs) describes the photo as "Shooting the sun at the South Geographical Pole. Amundsen (left) is holding a sextant. Helmer Hanssen (right) is bending over the artificial horizon, which is a tray of mercury. Amundsen is lining up the direct image of the sun with its reflection in the surface of the mercury."




            Amundsen's original South Pole Station




            When their sledge meters indicated they should be at the right place, they stopped at the location marked "Sledge" on the map at right (from The South Pole) to determine their position more accurately from sun shots. Amundsen then sent three men out on sledges at 90° intervals. Each went about 10 statute miles; in this way he assured that his party had encircled the Pole.



            ...



            At Polheim the team took a series of hourly observations for a 24-hour period to confirm their location




            Amundsen's original South Pole Station




            For the next three days the men worked to fix the exact position of the pole; after the conflicting and disputed claims of Cook and Peary in the north, Amundsen wanted to leave unmistakable markers for Scott.[139] After taking several sextant readings at different times of day, Bjaaland, Wisting and Hassel skied out in different directions to "box" the pole; Amundsen reasoned that between them they would bracket the exact point.[140] Finally the party pitched a tent, which they called Polheim, as near as possible to the actual pole as they could calculate by their observations. In the tent Amundsen left equipment for Scott, and a letter addressed to King Haakon which he requested Scott to deliver




            Wikipedia



            People still use sextants today, and they are still the best way to find latitude/longitude without GPS so it seems like is what one would use.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 20 hours ago









            wizzwizz4

            1033




            1033










            answered yesterday









            Charlie BrumbaughCharlie Brumbaugh

            46.3k16130258




            46.3k16130258








            • 1





              Is it necessary to directly look into the sun using this method?

              – M.Herzkamp
              3 hours ago














            • 1





              Is it necessary to directly look into the sun using this method?

              – M.Herzkamp
              3 hours ago








            1




            1





            Is it necessary to directly look into the sun using this method?

            – M.Herzkamp
            3 hours ago





            Is it necessary to directly look into the sun using this method?

            – M.Herzkamp
            3 hours ago











            3














            Take a time-lapse photo of the sky directly overhead at night. The moving stars will form circles in your photo, and if the center of the circles is directly overhead, you are there.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Bruce is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.
















            • 11





              In theory, this would work. In practice, an error of just one second of arc in aiming your camera upwards will result in an error of more than 300 meters in position. Sextants are designed for high-precision aiming; camera tripods aren't.

              – Mark
              yesterday






            • 1





              A comment on Mark's answer (above). An arcsecond corresponds to about 100 feet at the Earth's surface, not 300 meters. But his point is perfectly valid of course.

              – Patrick Wallace
              yesterday






            • 27





              All pre-GPS expeditions tried hard to be outta there before night.

              – kubanczyk
              23 hours ago






            • 7





              To clarify kubanczyk's comment: The poles are the lands of the midnight sun. If there are any stars visible, that means it is winter; you really don't want to walk to the South Pole in winter.

              – Martin Bonner
              5 hours ago
















            3














            Take a time-lapse photo of the sky directly overhead at night. The moving stars will form circles in your photo, and if the center of the circles is directly overhead, you are there.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Bruce is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.
















            • 11





              In theory, this would work. In practice, an error of just one second of arc in aiming your camera upwards will result in an error of more than 300 meters in position. Sextants are designed for high-precision aiming; camera tripods aren't.

              – Mark
              yesterday






            • 1





              A comment on Mark's answer (above). An arcsecond corresponds to about 100 feet at the Earth's surface, not 300 meters. But his point is perfectly valid of course.

              – Patrick Wallace
              yesterday






            • 27





              All pre-GPS expeditions tried hard to be outta there before night.

              – kubanczyk
              23 hours ago






            • 7





              To clarify kubanczyk's comment: The poles are the lands of the midnight sun. If there are any stars visible, that means it is winter; you really don't want to walk to the South Pole in winter.

              – Martin Bonner
              5 hours ago














            3












            3








            3







            Take a time-lapse photo of the sky directly overhead at night. The moving stars will form circles in your photo, and if the center of the circles is directly overhead, you are there.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Bruce is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.










            Take a time-lapse photo of the sky directly overhead at night. The moving stars will form circles in your photo, and if the center of the circles is directly overhead, you are there.







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Bruce is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor




            Bruce is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered yesterday









            BruceBruce

            311




            311




            New contributor




            Bruce is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Bruce is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Bruce is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            • 11





              In theory, this would work. In practice, an error of just one second of arc in aiming your camera upwards will result in an error of more than 300 meters in position. Sextants are designed for high-precision aiming; camera tripods aren't.

              – Mark
              yesterday






            • 1





              A comment on Mark's answer (above). An arcsecond corresponds to about 100 feet at the Earth's surface, not 300 meters. But his point is perfectly valid of course.

              – Patrick Wallace
              yesterday






            • 27





              All pre-GPS expeditions tried hard to be outta there before night.

              – kubanczyk
              23 hours ago






            • 7





              To clarify kubanczyk's comment: The poles are the lands of the midnight sun. If there are any stars visible, that means it is winter; you really don't want to walk to the South Pole in winter.

              – Martin Bonner
              5 hours ago














            • 11





              In theory, this would work. In practice, an error of just one second of arc in aiming your camera upwards will result in an error of more than 300 meters in position. Sextants are designed for high-precision aiming; camera tripods aren't.

              – Mark
              yesterday






            • 1





              A comment on Mark's answer (above). An arcsecond corresponds to about 100 feet at the Earth's surface, not 300 meters. But his point is perfectly valid of course.

              – Patrick Wallace
              yesterday






            • 27





              All pre-GPS expeditions tried hard to be outta there before night.

              – kubanczyk
              23 hours ago






            • 7





              To clarify kubanczyk's comment: The poles are the lands of the midnight sun. If there are any stars visible, that means it is winter; you really don't want to walk to the South Pole in winter.

              – Martin Bonner
              5 hours ago








            11




            11





            In theory, this would work. In practice, an error of just one second of arc in aiming your camera upwards will result in an error of more than 300 meters in position. Sextants are designed for high-precision aiming; camera tripods aren't.

            – Mark
            yesterday





            In theory, this would work. In practice, an error of just one second of arc in aiming your camera upwards will result in an error of more than 300 meters in position. Sextants are designed for high-precision aiming; camera tripods aren't.

            – Mark
            yesterday




            1




            1





            A comment on Mark's answer (above). An arcsecond corresponds to about 100 feet at the Earth's surface, not 300 meters. But his point is perfectly valid of course.

            – Patrick Wallace
            yesterday





            A comment on Mark's answer (above). An arcsecond corresponds to about 100 feet at the Earth's surface, not 300 meters. But his point is perfectly valid of course.

            – Patrick Wallace
            yesterday




            27




            27





            All pre-GPS expeditions tried hard to be outta there before night.

            – kubanczyk
            23 hours ago





            All pre-GPS expeditions tried hard to be outta there before night.

            – kubanczyk
            23 hours ago




            7




            7





            To clarify kubanczyk's comment: The poles are the lands of the midnight sun. If there are any stars visible, that means it is winter; you really don't want to walk to the South Pole in winter.

            – Martin Bonner
            5 hours ago





            To clarify kubanczyk's comment: The poles are the lands of the midnight sun. If there are any stars visible, that means it is winter; you really don't want to walk to the South Pole in winter.

            – Martin Bonner
            5 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to The Great Outdoors Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f21454%2fhow-do-you-know-you-have-reached-north-or-south-pole-without-gps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Polycentropodidae

            Magento 2 Error message: Invalid state change requested

            Paulmy