Distribution of sum of independent exponentials with random number of summands












3












$begingroup$


Let $tau_isimexpleft(lambdaright)$ be independent and identically distributed exponentials with parameter $lambda$. Then, for given $n$, the sum of these values
$$T_n := sum_{i=0}^n tau_i$$
follows an Erlang-Distribution with probability density function
$$pi(T_n=T| n,lambda)={lambda^n T^{n-1} e^{-lambda T} over (n-1)!}quadmbox{for }T, lambda geq 0.$$



I am interested in the distribution of $T_tilde n$ where $tilde n$ is a random variable such that for $tau_a sim exp(lambda_a)$ exponentially distributed, it holds that
$$T_tilde n leq tau_a \T_{tilde{n}+1} > tau_a.$$



In other words, $T_{tilde n}$ is truncated by an exponential distribution. I fail in deriving the distribution of $tilde n$ but maybe there is an easier way:
$$pileft(tilde n = kright) = pileft(T_n < tau_a|n=kright)\
=1-intlimits_{mathbb{R}^+}sumlimits_{n=0}^{k-1}frac{1}{n!}expleft(-(lambda+lambda_a)tau_aright)(taulambda_a)^nlambda_adtau_a.$$



However, just sampling and eye-balling looks to me like this density isn't that ugly:



iter <- 20000

lambda_a <- 1
lambda <- 2

df <- data.frame(tau=rep(NA, iter), a=rep(NA, iter))

for(i in 1:iter){
set.seed(i)
a <- rexp(1, rate = lambda_a)
s <- cumsum(rexp(500, rate = lambda))

df[i,] <- c(max(s[1], s[s<a]), a)
}

library(tidyverse)

ggplot(df %>% gather(), aes(x = value, fill = key)) +
geom_density(alpha = .3) + theme_bw()


enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would recommend not using the same notation for both $tau_i$ and the sum $tau_n$.
    $endgroup$
    – ukemi
    3 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$


Let $tau_isimexpleft(lambdaright)$ be independent and identically distributed exponentials with parameter $lambda$. Then, for given $n$, the sum of these values
$$T_n := sum_{i=0}^n tau_i$$
follows an Erlang-Distribution with probability density function
$$pi(T_n=T| n,lambda)={lambda^n T^{n-1} e^{-lambda T} over (n-1)!}quadmbox{for }T, lambda geq 0.$$



I am interested in the distribution of $T_tilde n$ where $tilde n$ is a random variable such that for $tau_a sim exp(lambda_a)$ exponentially distributed, it holds that
$$T_tilde n leq tau_a \T_{tilde{n}+1} > tau_a.$$



In other words, $T_{tilde n}$ is truncated by an exponential distribution. I fail in deriving the distribution of $tilde n$ but maybe there is an easier way:
$$pileft(tilde n = kright) = pileft(T_n < tau_a|n=kright)\
=1-intlimits_{mathbb{R}^+}sumlimits_{n=0}^{k-1}frac{1}{n!}expleft(-(lambda+lambda_a)tau_aright)(taulambda_a)^nlambda_adtau_a.$$



However, just sampling and eye-balling looks to me like this density isn't that ugly:



iter <- 20000

lambda_a <- 1
lambda <- 2

df <- data.frame(tau=rep(NA, iter), a=rep(NA, iter))

for(i in 1:iter){
set.seed(i)
a <- rexp(1, rate = lambda_a)
s <- cumsum(rexp(500, rate = lambda))

df[i,] <- c(max(s[1], s[s<a]), a)
}

library(tidyverse)

ggplot(df %>% gather(), aes(x = value, fill = key)) +
geom_density(alpha = .3) + theme_bw()


enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would recommend not using the same notation for both $tau_i$ and the sum $tau_n$.
    $endgroup$
    – ukemi
    3 hours ago
















3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


Let $tau_isimexpleft(lambdaright)$ be independent and identically distributed exponentials with parameter $lambda$. Then, for given $n$, the sum of these values
$$T_n := sum_{i=0}^n tau_i$$
follows an Erlang-Distribution with probability density function
$$pi(T_n=T| n,lambda)={lambda^n T^{n-1} e^{-lambda T} over (n-1)!}quadmbox{for }T, lambda geq 0.$$



I am interested in the distribution of $T_tilde n$ where $tilde n$ is a random variable such that for $tau_a sim exp(lambda_a)$ exponentially distributed, it holds that
$$T_tilde n leq tau_a \T_{tilde{n}+1} > tau_a.$$



In other words, $T_{tilde n}$ is truncated by an exponential distribution. I fail in deriving the distribution of $tilde n$ but maybe there is an easier way:
$$pileft(tilde n = kright) = pileft(T_n < tau_a|n=kright)\
=1-intlimits_{mathbb{R}^+}sumlimits_{n=0}^{k-1}frac{1}{n!}expleft(-(lambda+lambda_a)tau_aright)(taulambda_a)^nlambda_adtau_a.$$



However, just sampling and eye-balling looks to me like this density isn't that ugly:



iter <- 20000

lambda_a <- 1
lambda <- 2

df <- data.frame(tau=rep(NA, iter), a=rep(NA, iter))

for(i in 1:iter){
set.seed(i)
a <- rexp(1, rate = lambda_a)
s <- cumsum(rexp(500, rate = lambda))

df[i,] <- c(max(s[1], s[s<a]), a)
}

library(tidyverse)

ggplot(df %>% gather(), aes(x = value, fill = key)) +
geom_density(alpha = .3) + theme_bw()


enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $tau_isimexpleft(lambdaright)$ be independent and identically distributed exponentials with parameter $lambda$. Then, for given $n$, the sum of these values
$$T_n := sum_{i=0}^n tau_i$$
follows an Erlang-Distribution with probability density function
$$pi(T_n=T| n,lambda)={lambda^n T^{n-1} e^{-lambda T} over (n-1)!}quadmbox{for }T, lambda geq 0.$$



I am interested in the distribution of $T_tilde n$ where $tilde n$ is a random variable such that for $tau_a sim exp(lambda_a)$ exponentially distributed, it holds that
$$T_tilde n leq tau_a \T_{tilde{n}+1} > tau_a.$$



In other words, $T_{tilde n}$ is truncated by an exponential distribution. I fail in deriving the distribution of $tilde n$ but maybe there is an easier way:
$$pileft(tilde n = kright) = pileft(T_n < tau_a|n=kright)\
=1-intlimits_{mathbb{R}^+}sumlimits_{n=0}^{k-1}frac{1}{n!}expleft(-(lambda+lambda_a)tau_aright)(taulambda_a)^nlambda_adtau_a.$$



However, just sampling and eye-balling looks to me like this density isn't that ugly:



iter <- 20000

lambda_a <- 1
lambda <- 2

df <- data.frame(tau=rep(NA, iter), a=rep(NA, iter))

for(i in 1:iter){
set.seed(i)
a <- rexp(1, rate = lambda_a)
s <- cumsum(rexp(500, rate = lambda))

df[i,] <- c(max(s[1], s[s<a]), a)
}

library(tidyverse)

ggplot(df %>% gather(), aes(x = value, fill = key)) +
geom_density(alpha = .3) + theme_bw()


enter image description here







distributions exponential-family truncation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







muffin1974

















asked 4 hours ago









muffin1974muffin1974

519419




519419








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would recommend not using the same notation for both $tau_i$ and the sum $tau_n$.
    $endgroup$
    – ukemi
    3 hours ago
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would recommend not using the same notation for both $tau_i$ and the sum $tau_n$.
    $endgroup$
    – ukemi
    3 hours ago










1




1




$begingroup$
I would recommend not using the same notation for both $tau_i$ and the sum $tau_n$.
$endgroup$
– ukemi
3 hours ago






$begingroup$
I would recommend not using the same notation for both $tau_i$ and the sum $tau_n$.
$endgroup$
– ukemi
3 hours ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

As detailed in this X validated answer, waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed one produces an Poisson $mathcal P(lambda)$ variate $N$. Hence waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed $tau_a$ produces an Poisson $mathcal P(tau_alambda)$ variate $N$, conditional on $tau_a$. Therefore
begin{align*}
mathbb P(N=n)&=int_0^infty mathbb P(N=n|tau_a) ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&= int_0^infty dfrac{(lambdatau_a)^n}{n!},e^{-tau_alambda} ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},int_0^infty tau_a^n,e^{-tau_a(lambda+lambda_a)} ,text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},dfrac{Gamma(n+1)}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}
end{align*}

which is a Geometric $mathcal G(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda})$ random variable.



Considering now the distribution of$$zeta=sum_{i=1}^N tau_i$$the moment generating function of $zeta$ is
$$mathbb E[e^{zzeta}]=mathbb E[e^{z{tau_1+cdots+tau_N}}]=mathbb E^N[mathbb E^{tau_1}[e^{ztau_1}]^N]=E^N[{lambda/(lambda-z)}^N]=E^N[e^{N(ln lambda-ln (lambda-z))}]$$and the mgf of a Geometric $mathcal G(p)$ variate is
$$varphi_N(z)=dfrac{pe^z}{1-(1-p)e^z}$$Hence the moment generating function of $zeta$ is $$dfrac{pe^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}{1-(1-(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda}))e^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}=dfrac{p lambda}{ lambda-z-lambda^2/{lambda_a+lambda}}$$
modulo typing mistakes






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot @Xi'an! Do I get it right that in your notation $p= lambda_a/(lambda_a+lambda)$ ? Because then the moment generating function in the last line is equivalent to $frac{1}{1-zleft(plambdaright)^{-1}}$ which corresponds to the MGF of an exponential distribution..
    $endgroup$
    – muffin1974
    2 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f393832%2fdistribution-of-sum-of-independent-exponentials-with-random-number-of-summands%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

As detailed in this X validated answer, waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed one produces an Poisson $mathcal P(lambda)$ variate $N$. Hence waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed $tau_a$ produces an Poisson $mathcal P(tau_alambda)$ variate $N$, conditional on $tau_a$. Therefore
begin{align*}
mathbb P(N=n)&=int_0^infty mathbb P(N=n|tau_a) ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&= int_0^infty dfrac{(lambdatau_a)^n}{n!},e^{-tau_alambda} ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},int_0^infty tau_a^n,e^{-tau_a(lambda+lambda_a)} ,text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},dfrac{Gamma(n+1)}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}
end{align*}

which is a Geometric $mathcal G(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda})$ random variable.



Considering now the distribution of$$zeta=sum_{i=1}^N tau_i$$the moment generating function of $zeta$ is
$$mathbb E[e^{zzeta}]=mathbb E[e^{z{tau_1+cdots+tau_N}}]=mathbb E^N[mathbb E^{tau_1}[e^{ztau_1}]^N]=E^N[{lambda/(lambda-z)}^N]=E^N[e^{N(ln lambda-ln (lambda-z))}]$$and the mgf of a Geometric $mathcal G(p)$ variate is
$$varphi_N(z)=dfrac{pe^z}{1-(1-p)e^z}$$Hence the moment generating function of $zeta$ is $$dfrac{pe^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}{1-(1-(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda}))e^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}=dfrac{p lambda}{ lambda-z-lambda^2/{lambda_a+lambda}}$$
modulo typing mistakes






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot @Xi'an! Do I get it right that in your notation $p= lambda_a/(lambda_a+lambda)$ ? Because then the moment generating function in the last line is equivalent to $frac{1}{1-zleft(plambdaright)^{-1}}$ which corresponds to the MGF of an exponential distribution..
    $endgroup$
    – muffin1974
    2 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$

As detailed in this X validated answer, waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed one produces an Poisson $mathcal P(lambda)$ variate $N$. Hence waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed $tau_a$ produces an Poisson $mathcal P(tau_alambda)$ variate $N$, conditional on $tau_a$. Therefore
begin{align*}
mathbb P(N=n)&=int_0^infty mathbb P(N=n|tau_a) ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&= int_0^infty dfrac{(lambdatau_a)^n}{n!},e^{-tau_alambda} ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},int_0^infty tau_a^n,e^{-tau_a(lambda+lambda_a)} ,text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},dfrac{Gamma(n+1)}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}
end{align*}

which is a Geometric $mathcal G(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda})$ random variable.



Considering now the distribution of$$zeta=sum_{i=1}^N tau_i$$the moment generating function of $zeta$ is
$$mathbb E[e^{zzeta}]=mathbb E[e^{z{tau_1+cdots+tau_N}}]=mathbb E^N[mathbb E^{tau_1}[e^{ztau_1}]^N]=E^N[{lambda/(lambda-z)}^N]=E^N[e^{N(ln lambda-ln (lambda-z))}]$$and the mgf of a Geometric $mathcal G(p)$ variate is
$$varphi_N(z)=dfrac{pe^z}{1-(1-p)e^z}$$Hence the moment generating function of $zeta$ is $$dfrac{pe^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}{1-(1-(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda}))e^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}=dfrac{p lambda}{ lambda-z-lambda^2/{lambda_a+lambda}}$$
modulo typing mistakes






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot @Xi'an! Do I get it right that in your notation $p= lambda_a/(lambda_a+lambda)$ ? Because then the moment generating function in the last line is equivalent to $frac{1}{1-zleft(plambdaright)^{-1}}$ which corresponds to the MGF of an exponential distribution..
    $endgroup$
    – muffin1974
    2 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$

As detailed in this X validated answer, waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed one produces an Poisson $mathcal P(lambda)$ variate $N$. Hence waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed $tau_a$ produces an Poisson $mathcal P(tau_alambda)$ variate $N$, conditional on $tau_a$. Therefore
begin{align*}
mathbb P(N=n)&=int_0^infty mathbb P(N=n|tau_a) ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&= int_0^infty dfrac{(lambdatau_a)^n}{n!},e^{-tau_alambda} ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},int_0^infty tau_a^n,e^{-tau_a(lambda+lambda_a)} ,text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},dfrac{Gamma(n+1)}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}
end{align*}

which is a Geometric $mathcal G(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda})$ random variable.



Considering now the distribution of$$zeta=sum_{i=1}^N tau_i$$the moment generating function of $zeta$ is
$$mathbb E[e^{zzeta}]=mathbb E[e^{z{tau_1+cdots+tau_N}}]=mathbb E^N[mathbb E^{tau_1}[e^{ztau_1}]^N]=E^N[{lambda/(lambda-z)}^N]=E^N[e^{N(ln lambda-ln (lambda-z))}]$$and the mgf of a Geometric $mathcal G(p)$ variate is
$$varphi_N(z)=dfrac{pe^z}{1-(1-p)e^z}$$Hence the moment generating function of $zeta$ is $$dfrac{pe^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}{1-(1-(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda}))e^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}=dfrac{p lambda}{ lambda-z-lambda^2/{lambda_a+lambda}}$$
modulo typing mistakes






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



As detailed in this X validated answer, waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed one produces an Poisson $mathcal P(lambda)$ variate $N$. Hence waiting for a sum of iid exponential $mathcal E(lambda)$ variates to exceed $tau_a$ produces an Poisson $mathcal P(tau_alambda)$ variate $N$, conditional on $tau_a$. Therefore
begin{align*}
mathbb P(N=n)&=int_0^infty mathbb P(N=n|tau_a) ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&= int_0^infty dfrac{(lambdatau_a)^n}{n!},e^{-tau_alambda} ,lambda_a e^{-lambda_atau_a},text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},int_0^infty tau_a^n,e^{-tau_a(lambda+lambda_a)} ,text{d}tau_a\
&=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{n!},dfrac{Gamma(n+1)}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}=dfrac{lambda_alambda^n}{(lambda_a+lambda)^{n+1}}
end{align*}

which is a Geometric $mathcal G(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda})$ random variable.



Considering now the distribution of$$zeta=sum_{i=1}^N tau_i$$the moment generating function of $zeta$ is
$$mathbb E[e^{zzeta}]=mathbb E[e^{z{tau_1+cdots+tau_N}}]=mathbb E^N[mathbb E^{tau_1}[e^{ztau_1}]^N]=E^N[{lambda/(lambda-z)}^N]=E^N[e^{N(ln lambda-ln (lambda-z))}]$$and the mgf of a Geometric $mathcal G(p)$ variate is
$$varphi_N(z)=dfrac{pe^z}{1-(1-p)e^z}$$Hence the moment generating function of $zeta$ is $$dfrac{pe^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}{1-(1-(lambda_a/{lambda_a+lambda}))e^{ln lambda-ln (lambda-z)}}=dfrac{p lambda}{ lambda-z-lambda^2/{lambda_a+lambda}}$$
modulo typing mistakes







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









Xi'anXi'an

57.2k895360




57.2k895360












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot @Xi'an! Do I get it right that in your notation $p= lambda_a/(lambda_a+lambda)$ ? Because then the moment generating function in the last line is equivalent to $frac{1}{1-zleft(plambdaright)^{-1}}$ which corresponds to the MGF of an exponential distribution..
    $endgroup$
    – muffin1974
    2 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot @Xi'an! Do I get it right that in your notation $p= lambda_a/(lambda_a+lambda)$ ? Because then the moment generating function in the last line is equivalent to $frac{1}{1-zleft(plambdaright)^{-1}}$ which corresponds to the MGF of an exponential distribution..
    $endgroup$
    – muffin1974
    2 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Thanks a lot @Xi'an! Do I get it right that in your notation $p= lambda_a/(lambda_a+lambda)$ ? Because then the moment generating function in the last line is equivalent to $frac{1}{1-zleft(plambdaright)^{-1}}$ which corresponds to the MGF of an exponential distribution..
$endgroup$
– muffin1974
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thanks a lot @Xi'an! Do I get it right that in your notation $p= lambda_a/(lambda_a+lambda)$ ? Because then the moment generating function in the last line is equivalent to $frac{1}{1-zleft(plambdaright)^{-1}}$ which corresponds to the MGF of an exponential distribution..
$endgroup$
– muffin1974
2 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f393832%2fdistribution-of-sum-of-independent-exponentials-with-random-number-of-summands%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Polycentropodidae

Magento 2 Error message: Invalid state change requested

Paulmy