Why are energy weapons seen as more acceptable in children's shows than guns that fire bullets?












8















This is a question about the real-world factors that have influenced the development of science fiction and television for children.



In children's television (as well as movies), especially animation, there is a strong tendency toward using science fiction (or sometimes fantasy) energy weapons instead of more realistic weapons that fire projectiles. The leads to things like DC superhero cartoons, such as Superman (1988), featuring villains with laster pistols, even when the rest of the shows' technology is quite realistic; or Hank the ranger of the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon shooting yellow energy bolts from his bow, rather than arrows. (The fact that He-Man never seems to actually attack anybody with his magical sword, instead using it to deflect enemies' energy beams, is probably related.)



I know that this the energy weapons appear because they were considered less violent or disturbing than realistic slug-throwing weapons. But I would like to have a clearer picture of how it was decided that guns with bullets were worse. Was it because there would be more blood and body wounds with guns? Was it because there were worries that children would imitate characters they saw using guns? And how was the decision made that these were important concerns?










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

    – Robert Columbia
    3 hours ago


















8















This is a question about the real-world factors that have influenced the development of science fiction and television for children.



In children's television (as well as movies), especially animation, there is a strong tendency toward using science fiction (or sometimes fantasy) energy weapons instead of more realistic weapons that fire projectiles. The leads to things like DC superhero cartoons, such as Superman (1988), featuring villains with laster pistols, even when the rest of the shows' technology is quite realistic; or Hank the ranger of the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon shooting yellow energy bolts from his bow, rather than arrows. (The fact that He-Man never seems to actually attack anybody with his magical sword, instead using it to deflect enemies' energy beams, is probably related.)



I know that this the energy weapons appear because they were considered less violent or disturbing than realistic slug-throwing weapons. But I would like to have a clearer picture of how it was decided that guns with bullets were worse. Was it because there would be more blood and body wounds with guns? Was it because there were worries that children would imitate characters they saw using guns? And how was the decision made that these were important concerns?










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

    – Robert Columbia
    3 hours ago
















8












8








8








This is a question about the real-world factors that have influenced the development of science fiction and television for children.



In children's television (as well as movies), especially animation, there is a strong tendency toward using science fiction (or sometimes fantasy) energy weapons instead of more realistic weapons that fire projectiles. The leads to things like DC superhero cartoons, such as Superman (1988), featuring villains with laster pistols, even when the rest of the shows' technology is quite realistic; or Hank the ranger of the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon shooting yellow energy bolts from his bow, rather than arrows. (The fact that He-Man never seems to actually attack anybody with his magical sword, instead using it to deflect enemies' energy beams, is probably related.)



I know that this the energy weapons appear because they were considered less violent or disturbing than realistic slug-throwing weapons. But I would like to have a clearer picture of how it was decided that guns with bullets were worse. Was it because there would be more blood and body wounds with guns? Was it because there were worries that children would imitate characters they saw using guns? And how was the decision made that these were important concerns?










share|improve this question














This is a question about the real-world factors that have influenced the development of science fiction and television for children.



In children's television (as well as movies), especially animation, there is a strong tendency toward using science fiction (or sometimes fantasy) energy weapons instead of more realistic weapons that fire projectiles. The leads to things like DC superhero cartoons, such as Superman (1988), featuring villains with laster pistols, even when the rest of the shows' technology is quite realistic; or Hank the ranger of the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon shooting yellow energy bolts from his bow, rather than arrows. (The fact that He-Man never seems to actually attack anybody with his magical sword, instead using it to deflect enemies' energy beams, is probably related.)



I know that this the energy weapons appear because they were considered less violent or disturbing than realistic slug-throwing weapons. But I would like to have a clearer picture of how it was decided that guns with bullets were worse. Was it because there would be more blood and body wounds with guns? Was it because there were worries that children would imitate characters they saw using guns? And how was the decision made that these were important concerns?







tv science-fiction-genre






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









BuzzBuzz

37.2k6126203




37.2k6126203








  • 2





    Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

    – Robert Columbia
    3 hours ago
















  • 2





    Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

    – Robert Columbia
    3 hours ago










2




2





Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

– Robert Columbia
3 hours ago







Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

– Robert Columbia
3 hours ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















10














The Comics Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s:




(7) Scenes of excessive violence shall be prohibited. Scenes of brutal torture, excessive and unnecessary knife and gunplay, physical agony, gory and gruesome crime shall be eliminated. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR EDITORIAL MATTER)




Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered or maimed them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work.



Merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistol replicas and the CCA prohibited "realistic gun facsimile" toy sales:




(4) Advertising for the sale of knives or realistic gun facsimiles is prohibited. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR ADVERTISING MATTER)




There were similar codes for other media; in film, the Hays Code or MPCC forbade the "use of firearms"; and on TV the Code of Practices for Television Broadcasters (1954) also limited "brutality or physical agony by sight or by sound" as well as the "presentation of murder."



The aftereffects continue to this day. Well after the heyday of the MPCC and CCA and other codes, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in the media we grew up with.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    In an earlier edit, I called these things "laws" but they weren't strictly laws, but mutually agreed upon codes that all of the publishers/broadcasters/film distribution companies agreed upon.

    – RoboKaren
    2 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205557%2fwhy-are-energy-weapons-seen-as-more-acceptable-in-childrens-shows-than-guns-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10














The Comics Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s:




(7) Scenes of excessive violence shall be prohibited. Scenes of brutal torture, excessive and unnecessary knife and gunplay, physical agony, gory and gruesome crime shall be eliminated. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR EDITORIAL MATTER)




Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered or maimed them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work.



Merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistol replicas and the CCA prohibited "realistic gun facsimile" toy sales:




(4) Advertising for the sale of knives or realistic gun facsimiles is prohibited. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR ADVERTISING MATTER)




There were similar codes for other media; in film, the Hays Code or MPCC forbade the "use of firearms"; and on TV the Code of Practices for Television Broadcasters (1954) also limited "brutality or physical agony by sight or by sound" as well as the "presentation of murder."



The aftereffects continue to this day. Well after the heyday of the MPCC and CCA and other codes, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in the media we grew up with.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    In an earlier edit, I called these things "laws" but they weren't strictly laws, but mutually agreed upon codes that all of the publishers/broadcasters/film distribution companies agreed upon.

    – RoboKaren
    2 hours ago
















10














The Comics Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s:




(7) Scenes of excessive violence shall be prohibited. Scenes of brutal torture, excessive and unnecessary knife and gunplay, physical agony, gory and gruesome crime shall be eliminated. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR EDITORIAL MATTER)




Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered or maimed them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work.



Merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistol replicas and the CCA prohibited "realistic gun facsimile" toy sales:




(4) Advertising for the sale of knives or realistic gun facsimiles is prohibited. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR ADVERTISING MATTER)




There were similar codes for other media; in film, the Hays Code or MPCC forbade the "use of firearms"; and on TV the Code of Practices for Television Broadcasters (1954) also limited "brutality or physical agony by sight or by sound" as well as the "presentation of murder."



The aftereffects continue to this day. Well after the heyday of the MPCC and CCA and other codes, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in the media we grew up with.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    In an earlier edit, I called these things "laws" but they weren't strictly laws, but mutually agreed upon codes that all of the publishers/broadcasters/film distribution companies agreed upon.

    – RoboKaren
    2 hours ago














10












10








10







The Comics Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s:




(7) Scenes of excessive violence shall be prohibited. Scenes of brutal torture, excessive and unnecessary knife and gunplay, physical agony, gory and gruesome crime shall be eliminated. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR EDITORIAL MATTER)




Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered or maimed them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work.



Merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistol replicas and the CCA prohibited "realistic gun facsimile" toy sales:




(4) Advertising for the sale of knives or realistic gun facsimiles is prohibited. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR ADVERTISING MATTER)




There were similar codes for other media; in film, the Hays Code or MPCC forbade the "use of firearms"; and on TV the Code of Practices for Television Broadcasters (1954) also limited "brutality or physical agony by sight or by sound" as well as the "presentation of murder."



The aftereffects continue to this day. Well after the heyday of the MPCC and CCA and other codes, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in the media we grew up with.






share|improve this answer















The Comics Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s:




(7) Scenes of excessive violence shall be prohibited. Scenes of brutal torture, excessive and unnecessary knife and gunplay, physical agony, gory and gruesome crime shall be eliminated. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR EDITORIAL MATTER)




Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered or maimed them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work.



Merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistol replicas and the CCA prohibited "realistic gun facsimile" toy sales:




(4) Advertising for the sale of knives or realistic gun facsimiles is prohibited. (CCA 1954; CODE FOR ADVERTISING MATTER)




There were similar codes for other media; in film, the Hays Code or MPCC forbade the "use of firearms"; and on TV the Code of Practices for Television Broadcasters (1954) also limited "brutality or physical agony by sight or by sound" as well as the "presentation of murder."



The aftereffects continue to this day. Well after the heyday of the MPCC and CCA and other codes, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in the media we grew up with.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago









Stormblessed

1,577427




1,577427










answered 3 hours ago









RoboKarenRoboKaren

1,82011236




1,82011236








  • 2





    In an earlier edit, I called these things "laws" but they weren't strictly laws, but mutually agreed upon codes that all of the publishers/broadcasters/film distribution companies agreed upon.

    – RoboKaren
    2 hours ago














  • 2





    In an earlier edit, I called these things "laws" but they weren't strictly laws, but mutually agreed upon codes that all of the publishers/broadcasters/film distribution companies agreed upon.

    – RoboKaren
    2 hours ago








2




2





In an earlier edit, I called these things "laws" but they weren't strictly laws, but mutually agreed upon codes that all of the publishers/broadcasters/film distribution companies agreed upon.

– RoboKaren
2 hours ago





In an earlier edit, I called these things "laws" but they weren't strictly laws, but mutually agreed upon codes that all of the publishers/broadcasters/film distribution companies agreed upon.

– RoboKaren
2 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205557%2fwhy-are-energy-weapons-seen-as-more-acceptable-in-childrens-shows-than-guns-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Polycentropodidae

Magento 2 Error message: Invalid state change requested

Paulmy