Why would the editor in chief add a new reviewer after the first round of revision?












4















I have a manuscript submitted in a journal, and there is a newly-added reviewer after the first round of revision, which is surprising for me. The three other reviewers remain the same in the second round (this round) and agree with acceptance of the manuscript.



I don't know what reason is behind adding a new reviewer. Any thoughts?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Bagher erfanian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    4















    I have a manuscript submitted in a journal, and there is a newly-added reviewer after the first round of revision, which is surprising for me. The three other reviewers remain the same in the second round (this round) and agree with acceptance of the manuscript.



    I don't know what reason is behind adding a new reviewer. Any thoughts?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Bagher erfanian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      4












      4








      4








      I have a manuscript submitted in a journal, and there is a newly-added reviewer after the first round of revision, which is surprising for me. The three other reviewers remain the same in the second round (this round) and agree with acceptance of the manuscript.



      I don't know what reason is behind adding a new reviewer. Any thoughts?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Bagher erfanian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I have a manuscript submitted in a journal, and there is a newly-added reviewer after the first round of revision, which is surprising for me. The three other reviewers remain the same in the second round (this round) and agree with acceptance of the manuscript.



      I don't know what reason is behind adding a new reviewer. Any thoughts?







      publications journals peer-review






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Bagher erfanian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Bagher erfanian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago









      jakebeal

      146k31527768




      146k31527768






      New contributor




      Bagher erfanian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 8 hours ago









      Bagher erfanianBagher erfanian

      212




      212




      New contributor




      Bagher erfanian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Bagher erfanian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Bagher erfanian is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          While this is rare, it's not necessarily bad, and probably reflects more on the associate editor or the reviewers than you.



          One of the jobs of an editor is to ensure that reviewers are sufficiently well qualified, objective, and thorough in their evaluation of a manuscript. Likewise, an editor-in-chief needs to ensure the handling editor is doing their job well as well.



          It's hard to say without more details, but my guess on the most likely cause of this situation is that there was some issue with the original set of reviewers, such as:




          • Too many were your recommended reviewers

          • There was a critical missing perspective

          • One or more of the reviewers turned in a low-quality review (which the editor might have forced them to improve before it got to you)

          • The journal usually requires more than three reviews


          This could be caused by bad choices by the handling editor or by having more than three reviewers originally assigned but some failing to return reviews.



          Whatever the case may be, I would recommend not worrying about it too much. You can inquire with the editor if you wish, but don't be surprised if you don't get a particularly informative response (especially if the reason is a mistake they might feel embarrassed by).



          Bottom line: it's not so strange, and your paper is probably still in good shape, though its fate is never certain until accepted.






          share|improve this answer
























          • It is surprising to me because the comments of this newly-added reviewer are way too much general and unspecific.

            – Bagher erfanian
            6 hours ago











          • @Baghererfanian Maybe the journal just prefers to have four reviewers, then.

            – jakebeal
            5 hours ago



















          1














          There are two possibilities




          1. a reviewer dropped and needed to be replaced.


          2. the editor needed to get someone with specific content or methodological expertise.



          Those are the two most common reasons on why you see a change of reviewers. Sometimes you use a method and all three reviewers say they are not comfortable reviewing it.



          Jaret






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            Or the editor just didn't find someone's review helpful enough.

            – Buffy
            6 hours ago











          • All reviewers remain in the second round. Unfortunately, the comments of the new reviewer show that he is unfamiliar with our work :(

            – Bagher erfanian
            6 hours ago



















          0














          It's definitely unusual. We could speculate all kinds of reasons (innocent or nefarious). But you should be capable of brainstorming the same.



          You should send an email to the editor asking for an explanation.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "415"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Bagher erfanian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125108%2fwhy-would-the-editor-in-chief-add-a-new-reviewer-after-the-first-round-of-revisi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            While this is rare, it's not necessarily bad, and probably reflects more on the associate editor or the reviewers than you.



            One of the jobs of an editor is to ensure that reviewers are sufficiently well qualified, objective, and thorough in their evaluation of a manuscript. Likewise, an editor-in-chief needs to ensure the handling editor is doing their job well as well.



            It's hard to say without more details, but my guess on the most likely cause of this situation is that there was some issue with the original set of reviewers, such as:




            • Too many were your recommended reviewers

            • There was a critical missing perspective

            • One or more of the reviewers turned in a low-quality review (which the editor might have forced them to improve before it got to you)

            • The journal usually requires more than three reviews


            This could be caused by bad choices by the handling editor or by having more than three reviewers originally assigned but some failing to return reviews.



            Whatever the case may be, I would recommend not worrying about it too much. You can inquire with the editor if you wish, but don't be surprised if you don't get a particularly informative response (especially if the reason is a mistake they might feel embarrassed by).



            Bottom line: it's not so strange, and your paper is probably still in good shape, though its fate is never certain until accepted.






            share|improve this answer
























            • It is surprising to me because the comments of this newly-added reviewer are way too much general and unspecific.

              – Bagher erfanian
              6 hours ago











            • @Baghererfanian Maybe the journal just prefers to have four reviewers, then.

              – jakebeal
              5 hours ago
















            5














            While this is rare, it's not necessarily bad, and probably reflects more on the associate editor or the reviewers than you.



            One of the jobs of an editor is to ensure that reviewers are sufficiently well qualified, objective, and thorough in their evaluation of a manuscript. Likewise, an editor-in-chief needs to ensure the handling editor is doing their job well as well.



            It's hard to say without more details, but my guess on the most likely cause of this situation is that there was some issue with the original set of reviewers, such as:




            • Too many were your recommended reviewers

            • There was a critical missing perspective

            • One or more of the reviewers turned in a low-quality review (which the editor might have forced them to improve before it got to you)

            • The journal usually requires more than three reviews


            This could be caused by bad choices by the handling editor or by having more than three reviewers originally assigned but some failing to return reviews.



            Whatever the case may be, I would recommend not worrying about it too much. You can inquire with the editor if you wish, but don't be surprised if you don't get a particularly informative response (especially if the reason is a mistake they might feel embarrassed by).



            Bottom line: it's not so strange, and your paper is probably still in good shape, though its fate is never certain until accepted.






            share|improve this answer
























            • It is surprising to me because the comments of this newly-added reviewer are way too much general and unspecific.

              – Bagher erfanian
              6 hours ago











            • @Baghererfanian Maybe the journal just prefers to have four reviewers, then.

              – jakebeal
              5 hours ago














            5












            5








            5







            While this is rare, it's not necessarily bad, and probably reflects more on the associate editor or the reviewers than you.



            One of the jobs of an editor is to ensure that reviewers are sufficiently well qualified, objective, and thorough in their evaluation of a manuscript. Likewise, an editor-in-chief needs to ensure the handling editor is doing their job well as well.



            It's hard to say without more details, but my guess on the most likely cause of this situation is that there was some issue with the original set of reviewers, such as:




            • Too many were your recommended reviewers

            • There was a critical missing perspective

            • One or more of the reviewers turned in a low-quality review (which the editor might have forced them to improve before it got to you)

            • The journal usually requires more than three reviews


            This could be caused by bad choices by the handling editor or by having more than three reviewers originally assigned but some failing to return reviews.



            Whatever the case may be, I would recommend not worrying about it too much. You can inquire with the editor if you wish, but don't be surprised if you don't get a particularly informative response (especially if the reason is a mistake they might feel embarrassed by).



            Bottom line: it's not so strange, and your paper is probably still in good shape, though its fate is never certain until accepted.






            share|improve this answer













            While this is rare, it's not necessarily bad, and probably reflects more on the associate editor or the reviewers than you.



            One of the jobs of an editor is to ensure that reviewers are sufficiently well qualified, objective, and thorough in their evaluation of a manuscript. Likewise, an editor-in-chief needs to ensure the handling editor is doing their job well as well.



            It's hard to say without more details, but my guess on the most likely cause of this situation is that there was some issue with the original set of reviewers, such as:




            • Too many were your recommended reviewers

            • There was a critical missing perspective

            • One or more of the reviewers turned in a low-quality review (which the editor might have forced them to improve before it got to you)

            • The journal usually requires more than three reviews


            This could be caused by bad choices by the handling editor or by having more than three reviewers originally assigned but some failing to return reviews.



            Whatever the case may be, I would recommend not worrying about it too much. You can inquire with the editor if you wish, but don't be surprised if you don't get a particularly informative response (especially if the reason is a mistake they might feel embarrassed by).



            Bottom line: it's not so strange, and your paper is probably still in good shape, though its fate is never certain until accepted.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            jakebealjakebeal

            146k31527768




            146k31527768













            • It is surprising to me because the comments of this newly-added reviewer are way too much general and unspecific.

              – Bagher erfanian
              6 hours ago











            • @Baghererfanian Maybe the journal just prefers to have four reviewers, then.

              – jakebeal
              5 hours ago



















            • It is surprising to me because the comments of this newly-added reviewer are way too much general and unspecific.

              – Bagher erfanian
              6 hours ago











            • @Baghererfanian Maybe the journal just prefers to have four reviewers, then.

              – jakebeal
              5 hours ago

















            It is surprising to me because the comments of this newly-added reviewer are way too much general and unspecific.

            – Bagher erfanian
            6 hours ago





            It is surprising to me because the comments of this newly-added reviewer are way too much general and unspecific.

            – Bagher erfanian
            6 hours ago













            @Baghererfanian Maybe the journal just prefers to have four reviewers, then.

            – jakebeal
            5 hours ago





            @Baghererfanian Maybe the journal just prefers to have four reviewers, then.

            – jakebeal
            5 hours ago











            1














            There are two possibilities




            1. a reviewer dropped and needed to be replaced.


            2. the editor needed to get someone with specific content or methodological expertise.



            Those are the two most common reasons on why you see a change of reviewers. Sometimes you use a method and all three reviewers say they are not comfortable reviewing it.



            Jaret






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              Or the editor just didn't find someone's review helpful enough.

              – Buffy
              6 hours ago











            • All reviewers remain in the second round. Unfortunately, the comments of the new reviewer show that he is unfamiliar with our work :(

              – Bagher erfanian
              6 hours ago
















            1














            There are two possibilities




            1. a reviewer dropped and needed to be replaced.


            2. the editor needed to get someone with specific content or methodological expertise.



            Those are the two most common reasons on why you see a change of reviewers. Sometimes you use a method and all three reviewers say they are not comfortable reviewing it.



            Jaret






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              Or the editor just didn't find someone's review helpful enough.

              – Buffy
              6 hours ago











            • All reviewers remain in the second round. Unfortunately, the comments of the new reviewer show that he is unfamiliar with our work :(

              – Bagher erfanian
              6 hours ago














            1












            1








            1







            There are two possibilities




            1. a reviewer dropped and needed to be replaced.


            2. the editor needed to get someone with specific content or methodological expertise.



            Those are the two most common reasons on why you see a change of reviewers. Sometimes you use a method and all three reviewers say they are not comfortable reviewing it.



            Jaret






            share|improve this answer













            There are two possibilities




            1. a reviewer dropped and needed to be replaced.


            2. the editor needed to get someone with specific content or methodological expertise.



            Those are the two most common reasons on why you see a change of reviewers. Sometimes you use a method and all three reviewers say they are not comfortable reviewing it.



            Jaret







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            JWH2006JWH2006

            2,1212514




            2,1212514








            • 1





              Or the editor just didn't find someone's review helpful enough.

              – Buffy
              6 hours ago











            • All reviewers remain in the second round. Unfortunately, the comments of the new reviewer show that he is unfamiliar with our work :(

              – Bagher erfanian
              6 hours ago














            • 1





              Or the editor just didn't find someone's review helpful enough.

              – Buffy
              6 hours ago











            • All reviewers remain in the second round. Unfortunately, the comments of the new reviewer show that he is unfamiliar with our work :(

              – Bagher erfanian
              6 hours ago








            1




            1





            Or the editor just didn't find someone's review helpful enough.

            – Buffy
            6 hours ago





            Or the editor just didn't find someone's review helpful enough.

            – Buffy
            6 hours ago













            All reviewers remain in the second round. Unfortunately, the comments of the new reviewer show that he is unfamiliar with our work :(

            – Bagher erfanian
            6 hours ago





            All reviewers remain in the second round. Unfortunately, the comments of the new reviewer show that he is unfamiliar with our work :(

            – Bagher erfanian
            6 hours ago











            0














            It's definitely unusual. We could speculate all kinds of reasons (innocent or nefarious). But you should be capable of brainstorming the same.



            You should send an email to the editor asking for an explanation.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

























              0














              It's definitely unusual. We could speculate all kinds of reasons (innocent or nefarious). But you should be capable of brainstorming the same.



              You should send an email to the editor asking for an explanation.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                0












                0








                0







                It's definitely unusual. We could speculate all kinds of reasons (innocent or nefarious). But you should be capable of brainstorming the same.



                You should send an email to the editor asking for an explanation.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.










                It's definitely unusual. We could speculate all kinds of reasons (innocent or nefarious). But you should be capable of brainstorming the same.



                You should send an email to the editor asking for an explanation.







                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer






                New contributor




                guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered 6 hours ago









                guestguest

                292




                292




                New contributor




                guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                    Bagher erfanian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Bagher erfanian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Bagher erfanian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Bagher erfanian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125108%2fwhy-would-the-editor-in-chief-add-a-new-reviewer-after-the-first-round-of-revisi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Magento 2 controller redirect on button click in phtml file

                    Polycentropodidae