How would raising boys and girls separately affect the social structure of the family unit?












2












$begingroup$


This society traces its lineage through matrilineal lines, with witchcraft being exclusive to the female line. Ritual magic involves using the mana of the world and directing it in a way to suit you .It requires chanting, numerous ingredients, and a group of people depending on the spell. Society has evolved to raise boys in bulk for their unskilled labor, and are considered "sons of society". Girls are kept at home by their mother for proper training in witchcraft and are referred to as "daughters of their mother".



Family units are important because they provide for the needs of indiviuals and introduces them to the broader social structure of their world (sex and companionship between adults, raising and rearing of kids, protection from threats, etc). The classic "two parents + children" is common because it naturally organizes around human reproductive patterns and fulfills these requirements. This setup is unique in that it raises boys and girls differently due to magical ability. I need to make this system culturally viable over the long term to meet these needs. How can I do this?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In Europe we had separate schools for boys and girls up to the middle of the 20th century... Given that American English has the word "co-ed" to mean a female student, I think that the USA was in a similar situation.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    56 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Systems like that been culturally viable for thousands of years; boys go work in the field and girls are taught stitchcraft. Over the long term is easy. Into the modern age might not be.
    $endgroup$
    – Mazura
    8 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$


This society traces its lineage through matrilineal lines, with witchcraft being exclusive to the female line. Ritual magic involves using the mana of the world and directing it in a way to suit you .It requires chanting, numerous ingredients, and a group of people depending on the spell. Society has evolved to raise boys in bulk for their unskilled labor, and are considered "sons of society". Girls are kept at home by their mother for proper training in witchcraft and are referred to as "daughters of their mother".



Family units are important because they provide for the needs of indiviuals and introduces them to the broader social structure of their world (sex and companionship between adults, raising and rearing of kids, protection from threats, etc). The classic "two parents + children" is common because it naturally organizes around human reproductive patterns and fulfills these requirements. This setup is unique in that it raises boys and girls differently due to magical ability. I need to make this system culturally viable over the long term to meet these needs. How can I do this?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In Europe we had separate schools for boys and girls up to the middle of the 20th century... Given that American English has the word "co-ed" to mean a female student, I think that the USA was in a similar situation.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    56 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Systems like that been culturally viable for thousands of years; boys go work in the field and girls are taught stitchcraft. Over the long term is easy. Into the modern age might not be.
    $endgroup$
    – Mazura
    8 mins ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


This society traces its lineage through matrilineal lines, with witchcraft being exclusive to the female line. Ritual magic involves using the mana of the world and directing it in a way to suit you .It requires chanting, numerous ingredients, and a group of people depending on the spell. Society has evolved to raise boys in bulk for their unskilled labor, and are considered "sons of society". Girls are kept at home by their mother for proper training in witchcraft and are referred to as "daughters of their mother".



Family units are important because they provide for the needs of indiviuals and introduces them to the broader social structure of their world (sex and companionship between adults, raising and rearing of kids, protection from threats, etc). The classic "two parents + children" is common because it naturally organizes around human reproductive patterns and fulfills these requirements. This setup is unique in that it raises boys and girls differently due to magical ability. I need to make this system culturally viable over the long term to meet these needs. How can I do this?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




This society traces its lineage through matrilineal lines, with witchcraft being exclusive to the female line. Ritual magic involves using the mana of the world and directing it in a way to suit you .It requires chanting, numerous ingredients, and a group of people depending on the spell. Society has evolved to raise boys in bulk for their unskilled labor, and are considered "sons of society". Girls are kept at home by their mother for proper training in witchcraft and are referred to as "daughters of their mother".



Family units are important because they provide for the needs of indiviuals and introduces them to the broader social structure of their world (sex and companionship between adults, raising and rearing of kids, protection from threats, etc). The classic "two parents + children" is common because it naturally organizes around human reproductive patterns and fulfills these requirements. This setup is unique in that it raises boys and girls differently due to magical ability. I need to make this system culturally viable over the long term to meet these needs. How can I do this?







society social-norms






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









IncognitoIncognito

5,92565387




5,92565387












  • $begingroup$
    In Europe we had separate schools for boys and girls up to the middle of the 20th century... Given that American English has the word "co-ed" to mean a female student, I think that the USA was in a similar situation.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    56 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Systems like that been culturally viable for thousands of years; boys go work in the field and girls are taught stitchcraft. Over the long term is easy. Into the modern age might not be.
    $endgroup$
    – Mazura
    8 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    In Europe we had separate schools for boys and girls up to the middle of the 20th century... Given that American English has the word "co-ed" to mean a female student, I think that the USA was in a similar situation.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    56 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Systems like that been culturally viable for thousands of years; boys go work in the field and girls are taught stitchcraft. Over the long term is easy. Into the modern age might not be.
    $endgroup$
    – Mazura
    8 mins ago
















$begingroup$
In Europe we had separate schools for boys and girls up to the middle of the 20th century... Given that American English has the word "co-ed" to mean a female student, I think that the USA was in a similar situation.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
56 mins ago




$begingroup$
In Europe we had separate schools for boys and girls up to the middle of the 20th century... Given that American English has the word "co-ed" to mean a female student, I think that the USA was in a similar situation.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
56 mins ago












$begingroup$
Systems like that been culturally viable for thousands of years; boys go work in the field and girls are taught stitchcraft. Over the long term is easy. Into the modern age might not be.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
8 mins ago




$begingroup$
Systems like that been culturally viable for thousands of years; boys go work in the field and girls are taught stitchcraft. Over the long term is easy. Into the modern age might not be.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
8 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

This is also similar in some ways to the Spartan system.



http://www.historywiz.com/didyouknow/spartanfamily.htm




Children were children of the state more than of their parents. They were raised to be soldiers, loyal to the state, strong and self-disciplined.



It began in infancy. When a Spartan baby was born, soldiers came to the house and examined it carefully to determine its strength.The baby was bathed in wine rather than water, to see its reaction. If a baby was weak, the Spartans exposed it on the hillside or took it away to become a slave (helot). Infanticide was common in ancient cultures, but the Spartans were particularly picky about their children. It was not just a matter of the family, the city-state decided the fate of the child. Nurses had the primary care of the baby and did not coddle it.



Soldiers took the boys from their mothers at age 7, housed them in a dormitory with other boys and trained them as soldiers. The mother's softening influence was considered detrimental to a boy's education. The boys endured harsh physical discipline and deprivation to make them strong. The marched without shoes and went without food. They learned to fight, endure pain and survive through their wits. The older boys willingly participated in beating the younger boys to toughen them. Self-denial, simplicity, the warrior code, and loyalty to the city-state governed their lives.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It should be noted that in combination with the lack of mechanism to promote people into the Spartiate class, this system was not sustainable and lack of population in the warrior class contributed to the decline of lacedaemonian influence in Greek culture. However, it was primarily the infanticide that would have influenced that, so you should be fine if you avoid high levels of female infant mortality (say, from pickiness over magical use). Or don't and have it as a looming problem some of them are trying to deal with. Nice narrative tension ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You were faster than me at giving this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith: Classical Sparta had several mechanisms for promoting people into the Spartiate class. Look up trophimoi for example.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @AlexP While that does increase spartiate influence, the mechanism by which it works still does not address the declining numbers of the spartiate class. It's described as providing spartiate education to non-spartiates, but afterwards they were not inducted into the spartiate class (forming an intermediate class of their own). It doesn't actually increase the number of spartiates, only disseminates their education system to another class.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith: Second paragraph in the linked article: "They could rise to the status of citizens. According to Plutarch, Agis IV intended by this mean to strengthen the citizenry, that had become too meagre for Sparta's wartime necessities."
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

This setup is not unique. Levi-Strauss described very similar tribes where boys were raised by whole village in common huts while girls were with mothers and aunts who teached them skills unique for their gender.

You present matriarchal system where women, through magic, are the stronger gender. If you take "Pride and Prejudice" you have exactly your setup. Boys who are send to school and given jobs, males being only heirs and women raised in bulk with no particular skill above the ones needed to accompany their husbands.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It's worth noting that as the OP's society is matrilineal, the situation with males being the only heirs is reversed and the situation would likely turn out quite different.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith By the same setup I meant that one gender is the preferred one where the second is marginalised in society.
    $endgroup$
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    4 hours ago



















1












$begingroup$


Society has evolved to raise boys in bulk for their unskilled labor




This sounds like a society where males' only role is to impregnate a woman, she being the core and value bearer.



Therefore I would also expect that a family could be defined as "the group of women related by birth relationship", with no place for males, who could be just considered members of the "extended family", as they were just picked up to provide the semen on that particular day.



The males would then have to struggle and prove their value to be picked for mating, no serious and respectable woman wanting to mingle with a man of dubious reputation.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136829%2fhow-would-raising-boys-and-girls-separately-affect-the-social-structure-of-the-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    This is also similar in some ways to the Spartan system.



    http://www.historywiz.com/didyouknow/spartanfamily.htm




    Children were children of the state more than of their parents. They were raised to be soldiers, loyal to the state, strong and self-disciplined.



    It began in infancy. When a Spartan baby was born, soldiers came to the house and examined it carefully to determine its strength.The baby was bathed in wine rather than water, to see its reaction. If a baby was weak, the Spartans exposed it on the hillside or took it away to become a slave (helot). Infanticide was common in ancient cultures, but the Spartans were particularly picky about their children. It was not just a matter of the family, the city-state decided the fate of the child. Nurses had the primary care of the baby and did not coddle it.



    Soldiers took the boys from their mothers at age 7, housed them in a dormitory with other boys and trained them as soldiers. The mother's softening influence was considered detrimental to a boy's education. The boys endured harsh physical discipline and deprivation to make them strong. The marched without shoes and went without food. They learned to fight, endure pain and survive through their wits. The older boys willingly participated in beating the younger boys to toughen them. Self-denial, simplicity, the warrior code, and loyalty to the city-state governed their lives.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      It should be noted that in combination with the lack of mechanism to promote people into the Spartiate class, this system was not sustainable and lack of population in the warrior class contributed to the decline of lacedaemonian influence in Greek culture. However, it was primarily the infanticide that would have influenced that, so you should be fine if you avoid high levels of female infant mortality (say, from pickiness over magical use). Or don't and have it as a looming problem some of them are trying to deal with. Nice narrative tension ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You were faster than me at giving this answer.
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith: Classical Sparta had several mechanisms for promoting people into the Spartiate class. Look up trophimoi for example.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      3 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @AlexP While that does increase spartiate influence, the mechanism by which it works still does not address the declining numbers of the spartiate class. It's described as providing spartiate education to non-spartiates, but afterwards they were not inducted into the spartiate class (forming an intermediate class of their own). It doesn't actually increase the number of spartiates, only disseminates their education system to another class.
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith: Second paragraph in the linked article: "They could rise to the status of citizens. According to Plutarch, Agis IV intended by this mean to strengthen the citizenry, that had become too meagre for Sparta's wartime necessities."
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      2 hours ago
















    5












    $begingroup$

    This is also similar in some ways to the Spartan system.



    http://www.historywiz.com/didyouknow/spartanfamily.htm




    Children were children of the state more than of their parents. They were raised to be soldiers, loyal to the state, strong and self-disciplined.



    It began in infancy. When a Spartan baby was born, soldiers came to the house and examined it carefully to determine its strength.The baby was bathed in wine rather than water, to see its reaction. If a baby was weak, the Spartans exposed it on the hillside or took it away to become a slave (helot). Infanticide was common in ancient cultures, but the Spartans were particularly picky about their children. It was not just a matter of the family, the city-state decided the fate of the child. Nurses had the primary care of the baby and did not coddle it.



    Soldiers took the boys from their mothers at age 7, housed them in a dormitory with other boys and trained them as soldiers. The mother's softening influence was considered detrimental to a boy's education. The boys endured harsh physical discipline and deprivation to make them strong. The marched without shoes and went without food. They learned to fight, endure pain and survive through their wits. The older boys willingly participated in beating the younger boys to toughen them. Self-denial, simplicity, the warrior code, and loyalty to the city-state governed their lives.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      It should be noted that in combination with the lack of mechanism to promote people into the Spartiate class, this system was not sustainable and lack of population in the warrior class contributed to the decline of lacedaemonian influence in Greek culture. However, it was primarily the infanticide that would have influenced that, so you should be fine if you avoid high levels of female infant mortality (say, from pickiness over magical use). Or don't and have it as a looming problem some of them are trying to deal with. Nice narrative tension ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You were faster than me at giving this answer.
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith: Classical Sparta had several mechanisms for promoting people into the Spartiate class. Look up trophimoi for example.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      3 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @AlexP While that does increase spartiate influence, the mechanism by which it works still does not address the declining numbers of the spartiate class. It's described as providing spartiate education to non-spartiates, but afterwards they were not inducted into the spartiate class (forming an intermediate class of their own). It doesn't actually increase the number of spartiates, only disseminates their education system to another class.
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith: Second paragraph in the linked article: "They could rise to the status of citizens. According to Plutarch, Agis IV intended by this mean to strengthen the citizenry, that had become too meagre for Sparta's wartime necessities."
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      2 hours ago














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    This is also similar in some ways to the Spartan system.



    http://www.historywiz.com/didyouknow/spartanfamily.htm




    Children were children of the state more than of their parents. They were raised to be soldiers, loyal to the state, strong and self-disciplined.



    It began in infancy. When a Spartan baby was born, soldiers came to the house and examined it carefully to determine its strength.The baby was bathed in wine rather than water, to see its reaction. If a baby was weak, the Spartans exposed it on the hillside or took it away to become a slave (helot). Infanticide was common in ancient cultures, but the Spartans were particularly picky about their children. It was not just a matter of the family, the city-state decided the fate of the child. Nurses had the primary care of the baby and did not coddle it.



    Soldiers took the boys from their mothers at age 7, housed them in a dormitory with other boys and trained them as soldiers. The mother's softening influence was considered detrimental to a boy's education. The boys endured harsh physical discipline and deprivation to make them strong. The marched without shoes and went without food. They learned to fight, endure pain and survive through their wits. The older boys willingly participated in beating the younger boys to toughen them. Self-denial, simplicity, the warrior code, and loyalty to the city-state governed their lives.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    This is also similar in some ways to the Spartan system.



    http://www.historywiz.com/didyouknow/spartanfamily.htm




    Children were children of the state more than of their parents. They were raised to be soldiers, loyal to the state, strong and self-disciplined.



    It began in infancy. When a Spartan baby was born, soldiers came to the house and examined it carefully to determine its strength.The baby was bathed in wine rather than water, to see its reaction. If a baby was weak, the Spartans exposed it on the hillside or took it away to become a slave (helot). Infanticide was common in ancient cultures, but the Spartans were particularly picky about their children. It was not just a matter of the family, the city-state decided the fate of the child. Nurses had the primary care of the baby and did not coddle it.



    Soldiers took the boys from their mothers at age 7, housed them in a dormitory with other boys and trained them as soldiers. The mother's softening influence was considered detrimental to a boy's education. The boys endured harsh physical discipline and deprivation to make them strong. The marched without shoes and went without food. They learned to fight, endure pain and survive through their wits. The older boys willingly participated in beating the younger boys to toughen them. Self-denial, simplicity, the warrior code, and loyalty to the city-state governed their lives.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 5 hours ago









    Tim BTim B

    60.9k23172290




    60.9k23172290












    • $begingroup$
      It should be noted that in combination with the lack of mechanism to promote people into the Spartiate class, this system was not sustainable and lack of population in the warrior class contributed to the decline of lacedaemonian influence in Greek culture. However, it was primarily the infanticide that would have influenced that, so you should be fine if you avoid high levels of female infant mortality (say, from pickiness over magical use). Or don't and have it as a looming problem some of them are trying to deal with. Nice narrative tension ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You were faster than me at giving this answer.
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith: Classical Sparta had several mechanisms for promoting people into the Spartiate class. Look up trophimoi for example.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      3 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @AlexP While that does increase spartiate influence, the mechanism by which it works still does not address the declining numbers of the spartiate class. It's described as providing spartiate education to non-spartiates, but afterwards they were not inducted into the spartiate class (forming an intermediate class of their own). It doesn't actually increase the number of spartiates, only disseminates their education system to another class.
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith: Second paragraph in the linked article: "They could rise to the status of citizens. According to Plutarch, Agis IV intended by this mean to strengthen the citizenry, that had become too meagre for Sparta's wartime necessities."
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      2 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      It should be noted that in combination with the lack of mechanism to promote people into the Spartiate class, this system was not sustainable and lack of population in the warrior class contributed to the decline of lacedaemonian influence in Greek culture. However, it was primarily the infanticide that would have influenced that, so you should be fine if you avoid high levels of female infant mortality (say, from pickiness over magical use). Or don't and have it as a looming problem some of them are trying to deal with. Nice narrative tension ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You were faster than me at giving this answer.
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith: Classical Sparta had several mechanisms for promoting people into the Spartiate class. Look up trophimoi for example.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      3 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @AlexP While that does increase spartiate influence, the mechanism by which it works still does not address the declining numbers of the spartiate class. It's described as providing spartiate education to non-spartiates, but afterwards they were not inducted into the spartiate class (forming an intermediate class of their own). It doesn't actually increase the number of spartiates, only disseminates their education system to another class.
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith: Second paragraph in the linked article: "They could rise to the status of citizens. According to Plutarch, Agis IV intended by this mean to strengthen the citizenry, that had become too meagre for Sparta's wartime necessities."
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      2 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    It should be noted that in combination with the lack of mechanism to promote people into the Spartiate class, this system was not sustainable and lack of population in the warrior class contributed to the decline of lacedaemonian influence in Greek culture. However, it was primarily the infanticide that would have influenced that, so you should be fine if you avoid high levels of female infant mortality (say, from pickiness over magical use). Or don't and have it as a looming problem some of them are trying to deal with. Nice narrative tension ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    It should be noted that in combination with the lack of mechanism to promote people into the Spartiate class, this system was not sustainable and lack of population in the warrior class contributed to the decline of lacedaemonian influence in Greek culture. However, it was primarily the infanticide that would have influenced that, so you should be fine if you avoid high levels of female infant mortality (say, from pickiness over magical use). Or don't and have it as a looming problem some of them are trying to deal with. Nice narrative tension ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    4 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    You were faster than me at giving this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You were faster than me at giving this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    3 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith: Classical Sparta had several mechanisms for promoting people into the Spartiate class. Look up trophimoi for example.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    3 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith: Classical Sparta had several mechanisms for promoting people into the Spartiate class. Look up trophimoi for example.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    3 hours ago














    $begingroup$
    @AlexP While that does increase spartiate influence, the mechanism by which it works still does not address the declining numbers of the spartiate class. It's described as providing spartiate education to non-spartiates, but afterwards they were not inducted into the spartiate class (forming an intermediate class of their own). It doesn't actually increase the number of spartiates, only disseminates their education system to another class.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @AlexP While that does increase spartiate influence, the mechanism by which it works still does not address the declining numbers of the spartiate class. It's described as providing spartiate education to non-spartiates, but afterwards they were not inducted into the spartiate class (forming an intermediate class of their own). It doesn't actually increase the number of spartiates, only disseminates their education system to another class.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith: Second paragraph in the linked article: "They could rise to the status of citizens. According to Plutarch, Agis IV intended by this mean to strengthen the citizenry, that had become too meagre for Sparta's wartime necessities."
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith: Second paragraph in the linked article: "They could rise to the status of citizens. According to Plutarch, Agis IV intended by this mean to strengthen the citizenry, that had become too meagre for Sparta's wartime necessities."
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago











    2












    $begingroup$

    This setup is not unique. Levi-Strauss described very similar tribes where boys were raised by whole village in common huts while girls were with mothers and aunts who teached them skills unique for their gender.

    You present matriarchal system where women, through magic, are the stronger gender. If you take "Pride and Prejudice" you have exactly your setup. Boys who are send to school and given jobs, males being only heirs and women raised in bulk with no particular skill above the ones needed to accompany their husbands.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      It's worth noting that as the OP's society is matrilineal, the situation with males being the only heirs is reversed and the situation would likely turn out quite different.
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      4 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith By the same setup I meant that one gender is the preferred one where the second is marginalised in society.
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      4 hours ago
















    2












    $begingroup$

    This setup is not unique. Levi-Strauss described very similar tribes where boys were raised by whole village in common huts while girls were with mothers and aunts who teached them skills unique for their gender.

    You present matriarchal system where women, through magic, are the stronger gender. If you take "Pride and Prejudice" you have exactly your setup. Boys who are send to school and given jobs, males being only heirs and women raised in bulk with no particular skill above the ones needed to accompany their husbands.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      It's worth noting that as the OP's society is matrilineal, the situation with males being the only heirs is reversed and the situation would likely turn out quite different.
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      4 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith By the same setup I meant that one gender is the preferred one where the second is marginalised in society.
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      4 hours ago














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    This setup is not unique. Levi-Strauss described very similar tribes where boys were raised by whole village in common huts while girls were with mothers and aunts who teached them skills unique for their gender.

    You present matriarchal system where women, through magic, are the stronger gender. If you take "Pride and Prejudice" you have exactly your setup. Boys who are send to school and given jobs, males being only heirs and women raised in bulk with no particular skill above the ones needed to accompany their husbands.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    This setup is not unique. Levi-Strauss described very similar tribes where boys were raised by whole village in common huts while girls were with mothers and aunts who teached them skills unique for their gender.

    You present matriarchal system where women, through magic, are the stronger gender. If you take "Pride and Prejudice" you have exactly your setup. Boys who are send to school and given jobs, males being only heirs and women raised in bulk with no particular skill above the ones needed to accompany their husbands.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 5 hours ago









    SZCZERZO KŁYSZCZERZO KŁY

    16.8k22553




    16.8k22553












    • $begingroup$
      It's worth noting that as the OP's society is matrilineal, the situation with males being the only heirs is reversed and the situation would likely turn out quite different.
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      4 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith By the same setup I meant that one gender is the preferred one where the second is marginalised in society.
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      4 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      It's worth noting that as the OP's society is matrilineal, the situation with males being the only heirs is reversed and the situation would likely turn out quite different.
      $endgroup$
      – Ynneadwraith
      4 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Ynneadwraith By the same setup I meant that one gender is the preferred one where the second is marginalised in society.
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      4 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    It's worth noting that as the OP's society is matrilineal, the situation with males being the only heirs is reversed and the situation would likely turn out quite different.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    It's worth noting that as the OP's society is matrilineal, the situation with males being the only heirs is reversed and the situation would likely turn out quite different.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    4 hours ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith By the same setup I meant that one gender is the preferred one where the second is marginalised in society.
    $endgroup$
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith By the same setup I meant that one gender is the preferred one where the second is marginalised in society.
    $endgroup$
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    4 hours ago











    1












    $begingroup$


    Society has evolved to raise boys in bulk for their unskilled labor




    This sounds like a society where males' only role is to impregnate a woman, she being the core and value bearer.



    Therefore I would also expect that a family could be defined as "the group of women related by birth relationship", with no place for males, who could be just considered members of the "extended family", as they were just picked up to provide the semen on that particular day.



    The males would then have to struggle and prove their value to be picked for mating, no serious and respectable woman wanting to mingle with a man of dubious reputation.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$


      Society has evolved to raise boys in bulk for their unskilled labor




      This sounds like a society where males' only role is to impregnate a woman, she being the core and value bearer.



      Therefore I would also expect that a family could be defined as "the group of women related by birth relationship", with no place for males, who could be just considered members of the "extended family", as they were just picked up to provide the semen on that particular day.



      The males would then have to struggle and prove their value to be picked for mating, no serious and respectable woman wanting to mingle with a man of dubious reputation.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$


        Society has evolved to raise boys in bulk for their unskilled labor




        This sounds like a society where males' only role is to impregnate a woman, she being the core and value bearer.



        Therefore I would also expect that a family could be defined as "the group of women related by birth relationship", with no place for males, who could be just considered members of the "extended family", as they were just picked up to provide the semen on that particular day.



        The males would then have to struggle and prove their value to be picked for mating, no serious and respectable woman wanting to mingle with a man of dubious reputation.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




        Society has evolved to raise boys in bulk for their unskilled labor




        This sounds like a society where males' only role is to impregnate a woman, she being the core and value bearer.



        Therefore I would also expect that a family could be defined as "the group of women related by birth relationship", with no place for males, who could be just considered members of the "extended family", as they were just picked up to provide the semen on that particular day.



        The males would then have to struggle and prove their value to be picked for mating, no serious and respectable woman wanting to mingle with a man of dubious reputation.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        L.DutchL.Dutch

        79.8k26191388




        79.8k26191388






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136829%2fhow-would-raising-boys-and-girls-separately-affect-the-social-structure-of-the-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Polycentropodidae

            Magento 2 Error message: Invalid state change requested

            Paulmy