“Fish and chips shop” or “fish and chip shop”?
When referring to a restaurant specializing in fish and chips would you call it a fish and chip shop or a fish and chips shop?
word-choice grammatical-number compounds attributive-nouns
New contributor
|
show 7 more comments
When referring to a restaurant specializing in fish and chips would you call it a fish and chip shop or a fish and chips shop?
word-choice grammatical-number compounds attributive-nouns
New contributor
"Fish" is plural like "people". On the other hand if you describe several kinds of fish or people you can use "fishes" and "peoples".
– Rusty Core
13 hours ago
@RustyCore we very rarely say "fishes" and I have absolutely never seen a "fishes" shop.
– Weather Vane
13 hours ago
Does this mean I'm wrong in describing someone as a meat and potatoes guy? I've always used the the plural potatoes.
– Larry Hopkins
12 hours ago
Larry that refers to a dish he likes rather than a shop.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
1
If the term were "fish and chips shop", the extra "s" would decay rapidly because few people would take the time to clearly enunciate it separately from the "s" in "shop".
– Boann
9 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
When referring to a restaurant specializing in fish and chips would you call it a fish and chip shop or a fish and chips shop?
word-choice grammatical-number compounds attributive-nouns
New contributor
When referring to a restaurant specializing in fish and chips would you call it a fish and chip shop or a fish and chips shop?
word-choice grammatical-number compounds attributive-nouns
word-choice grammatical-number compounds attributive-nouns
New contributor
New contributor
edited 10 hours ago
Mari-Lou A
62.3k55221458
62.3k55221458
New contributor
asked 13 hours ago
Larry HopkinsLarry Hopkins
212
212
New contributor
New contributor
"Fish" is plural like "people". On the other hand if you describe several kinds of fish or people you can use "fishes" and "peoples".
– Rusty Core
13 hours ago
@RustyCore we very rarely say "fishes" and I have absolutely never seen a "fishes" shop.
– Weather Vane
13 hours ago
Does this mean I'm wrong in describing someone as a meat and potatoes guy? I've always used the the plural potatoes.
– Larry Hopkins
12 hours ago
Larry that refers to a dish he likes rather than a shop.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
1
If the term were "fish and chips shop", the extra "s" would decay rapidly because few people would take the time to clearly enunciate it separately from the "s" in "shop".
– Boann
9 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
"Fish" is plural like "people". On the other hand if you describe several kinds of fish or people you can use "fishes" and "peoples".
– Rusty Core
13 hours ago
@RustyCore we very rarely say "fishes" and I have absolutely never seen a "fishes" shop.
– Weather Vane
13 hours ago
Does this mean I'm wrong in describing someone as a meat and potatoes guy? I've always used the the plural potatoes.
– Larry Hopkins
12 hours ago
Larry that refers to a dish he likes rather than a shop.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
1
If the term were "fish and chips shop", the extra "s" would decay rapidly because few people would take the time to clearly enunciate it separately from the "s" in "shop".
– Boann
9 hours ago
"Fish" is plural like "people". On the other hand if you describe several kinds of fish or people you can use "fishes" and "peoples".
– Rusty Core
13 hours ago
"Fish" is plural like "people". On the other hand if you describe several kinds of fish or people you can use "fishes" and "peoples".
– Rusty Core
13 hours ago
@RustyCore we very rarely say "fishes" and I have absolutely never seen a "fishes" shop.
– Weather Vane
13 hours ago
@RustyCore we very rarely say "fishes" and I have absolutely never seen a "fishes" shop.
– Weather Vane
13 hours ago
Does this mean I'm wrong in describing someone as a meat and potatoes guy? I've always used the the plural potatoes.
– Larry Hopkins
12 hours ago
Does this mean I'm wrong in describing someone as a meat and potatoes guy? I've always used the the plural potatoes.
– Larry Hopkins
12 hours ago
Larry that refers to a dish he likes rather than a shop.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
Larry that refers to a dish he likes rather than a shop.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
1
1
If the term were "fish and chips shop", the extra "s" would decay rapidly because few people would take the time to clearly enunciate it separately from the "s" in "shop".
– Boann
9 hours ago
If the term were "fish and chips shop", the extra "s" would decay rapidly because few people would take the time to clearly enunciate it separately from the "s" in "shop".
– Boann
9 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
It is a "fish and chip" shop, but you order "fish and chips".
Or just a chip shop since they always sell fish too.
In general, a shop selling a product refers to its product as a collective noun in the singular.
Chip shop — sells chips.
Cake shop — sells cakes.
Curtain shop — sells curtains.
2
In the UK I presume. In Canada there are "chip wagons." These are trucks that sell french fried potatoes with gravy and curds. This is extremely popular in Quebec. No fish. It's called "poutine."
– puppetsock
12 hours ago
@puppetsock for French StackExchange?
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
@puppetsock moi, j'ai un "passion de pois".
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
In Canada there are also 'fish and chip shops', and also 'chip trucks' that may sell chips (or fries) with or without cheese curds and gravy.
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
2
@Mari-LouA "chippy" is still in vogue AFAIK.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
"Attributive nouns" or the first elements of compound nouns tend to be singular in form
There is no absolute rule forbidding the use of a plural noun in the first part of a compound, but it is more usual in general to use the singular form.* "Fish and chip(s) shop" doesn't seem to be an exception to this tendency.
The Google Ngram Viewer suggests that both forms exist, but that "fish and chip shop" is more common than "fish and chips shop":
I don't think phonetics is an important factor
Some comments have brought up the supposed phonetic indistiguishability of "fish and chip shop" and "fish and chips shop", but I can't see how that could determine the spelling one way or another: even if it is true that nobody ever pronounces these any differently in practice (which I rather doubt), that wouldn't prevent people from using the spelling "fish and chips shop" for the pronunciation [fɪʃn̩t͡ʃɪpʃɒp]. I think the use of the spelling "fish and chip shop" is based mainly on grammar, not on phonetics.
*Some exceptions to this tendency are mentioned in the answer here: Singular/plural Nouns as Adjectives
add a comment |
Either way should be acceptable.
New contributor
2
Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition (linked to the source) and examples of its use. Or if that sounds like too much effort (given the other answers), you can always delete your post. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
7 hours ago
1
This is not just a good start; this is the correct answer. First, because it's for a business, and businesses aren't subject to grammar or usage rules. Second, because there's no difference between Fish and Chips Shop and Fish and Chip Shop in English. Nobody can hear the /s/ at the end of Chips when it comes before the /ʃ/ of Shop. The phrases are identical in pronunciation, and how they are spelled is irrelevant because advertising makes its own rules.
– John Lawler
6 hours ago
2
@John Businesses can name their restaurants any way they want to, but this has nothing to do with businesses or naming. A hat maker is also a business, but that doesn’t mean there’s no reason not to call it a hats maker. Moreover, it’s empirically false that there’s no phonetic distinction between the two – there certainly is in my English. A word-final consonant followed by a homorganic word-initial consonant result in a geminate consonant to me; win no and winnow are not pronounced the same, and nor are chip shop and chips shop.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
5 hours ago
add a comment |
When a noun is used as an adjective, it is almost always the singular form, even when the noun is not normally used as a singular. E.g:
- car - car alarm
- house - house key
- trousers - trouser press
- spectacles - spectacle maker
But:
- clothes - clothes line
So, "fish and chips" is the noun phrase, and becomes singular:
- fish and chips - fish and chip shop
"Almost always" may overstate things. A number of exceptions are mentioned in this answer: english.stackexchange.com/a/397244/77227
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic After reading that answer, I'd still advise using the singular as a rule of thumb.
– CJ Dennis
6 hours ago
Right, I agree about that as a rule of thumb, I was just quibbling about the wording "almost always". I'd guess that there are more than a hundred exceptions
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic Mostly always then? ;)
– Jason Bassford
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Larry Hopkins is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484719%2ffish-and-chips-shop-or-fish-and-chip-shop%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is a "fish and chip" shop, but you order "fish and chips".
Or just a chip shop since they always sell fish too.
In general, a shop selling a product refers to its product as a collective noun in the singular.
Chip shop — sells chips.
Cake shop — sells cakes.
Curtain shop — sells curtains.
2
In the UK I presume. In Canada there are "chip wagons." These are trucks that sell french fried potatoes with gravy and curds. This is extremely popular in Quebec. No fish. It's called "poutine."
– puppetsock
12 hours ago
@puppetsock for French StackExchange?
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
@puppetsock moi, j'ai un "passion de pois".
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
In Canada there are also 'fish and chip shops', and also 'chip trucks' that may sell chips (or fries) with or without cheese curds and gravy.
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
2
@Mari-LouA "chippy" is still in vogue AFAIK.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
It is a "fish and chip" shop, but you order "fish and chips".
Or just a chip shop since they always sell fish too.
In general, a shop selling a product refers to its product as a collective noun in the singular.
Chip shop — sells chips.
Cake shop — sells cakes.
Curtain shop — sells curtains.
2
In the UK I presume. In Canada there are "chip wagons." These are trucks that sell french fried potatoes with gravy and curds. This is extremely popular in Quebec. No fish. It's called "poutine."
– puppetsock
12 hours ago
@puppetsock for French StackExchange?
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
@puppetsock moi, j'ai un "passion de pois".
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
In Canada there are also 'fish and chip shops', and also 'chip trucks' that may sell chips (or fries) with or without cheese curds and gravy.
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
2
@Mari-LouA "chippy" is still in vogue AFAIK.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
It is a "fish and chip" shop, but you order "fish and chips".
Or just a chip shop since they always sell fish too.
In general, a shop selling a product refers to its product as a collective noun in the singular.
Chip shop — sells chips.
Cake shop — sells cakes.
Curtain shop — sells curtains.
It is a "fish and chip" shop, but you order "fish and chips".
Or just a chip shop since they always sell fish too.
In general, a shop selling a product refers to its product as a collective noun in the singular.
Chip shop — sells chips.
Cake shop — sells cakes.
Curtain shop — sells curtains.
answered 13 hours ago
Weather VaneWeather Vane
2,254414
2,254414
2
In the UK I presume. In Canada there are "chip wagons." These are trucks that sell french fried potatoes with gravy and curds. This is extremely popular in Quebec. No fish. It's called "poutine."
– puppetsock
12 hours ago
@puppetsock for French StackExchange?
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
@puppetsock moi, j'ai un "passion de pois".
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
In Canada there are also 'fish and chip shops', and also 'chip trucks' that may sell chips (or fries) with or without cheese curds and gravy.
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
2
@Mari-LouA "chippy" is still in vogue AFAIK.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
2
In the UK I presume. In Canada there are "chip wagons." These are trucks that sell french fried potatoes with gravy and curds. This is extremely popular in Quebec. No fish. It's called "poutine."
– puppetsock
12 hours ago
@puppetsock for French StackExchange?
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
@puppetsock moi, j'ai un "passion de pois".
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
In Canada there are also 'fish and chip shops', and also 'chip trucks' that may sell chips (or fries) with or without cheese curds and gravy.
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
2
@Mari-LouA "chippy" is still in vogue AFAIK.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
2
2
In the UK I presume. In Canada there are "chip wagons." These are trucks that sell french fried potatoes with gravy and curds. This is extremely popular in Quebec. No fish. It's called "poutine."
– puppetsock
12 hours ago
In the UK I presume. In Canada there are "chip wagons." These are trucks that sell french fried potatoes with gravy and curds. This is extremely popular in Quebec. No fish. It's called "poutine."
– puppetsock
12 hours ago
@puppetsock for French StackExchange?
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
@puppetsock for French StackExchange?
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
1
@puppetsock moi, j'ai un "passion de pois".
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
@puppetsock moi, j'ai un "passion de pois".
– Weather Vane
12 hours ago
1
1
In Canada there are also 'fish and chip shops', and also 'chip trucks' that may sell chips (or fries) with or without cheese curds and gravy.
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
In Canada there are also 'fish and chip shops', and also 'chip trucks' that may sell chips (or fries) with or without cheese curds and gravy.
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
2
2
@Mari-LouA "chippy" is still in vogue AFAIK.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
@Mari-LouA "chippy" is still in vogue AFAIK.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
"Attributive nouns" or the first elements of compound nouns tend to be singular in form
There is no absolute rule forbidding the use of a plural noun in the first part of a compound, but it is more usual in general to use the singular form.* "Fish and chip(s) shop" doesn't seem to be an exception to this tendency.
The Google Ngram Viewer suggests that both forms exist, but that "fish and chip shop" is more common than "fish and chips shop":
I don't think phonetics is an important factor
Some comments have brought up the supposed phonetic indistiguishability of "fish and chip shop" and "fish and chips shop", but I can't see how that could determine the spelling one way or another: even if it is true that nobody ever pronounces these any differently in practice (which I rather doubt), that wouldn't prevent people from using the spelling "fish and chips shop" for the pronunciation [fɪʃn̩t͡ʃɪpʃɒp]. I think the use of the spelling "fish and chip shop" is based mainly on grammar, not on phonetics.
*Some exceptions to this tendency are mentioned in the answer here: Singular/plural Nouns as Adjectives
add a comment |
"Attributive nouns" or the first elements of compound nouns tend to be singular in form
There is no absolute rule forbidding the use of a plural noun in the first part of a compound, but it is more usual in general to use the singular form.* "Fish and chip(s) shop" doesn't seem to be an exception to this tendency.
The Google Ngram Viewer suggests that both forms exist, but that "fish and chip shop" is more common than "fish and chips shop":
I don't think phonetics is an important factor
Some comments have brought up the supposed phonetic indistiguishability of "fish and chip shop" and "fish and chips shop", but I can't see how that could determine the spelling one way or another: even if it is true that nobody ever pronounces these any differently in practice (which I rather doubt), that wouldn't prevent people from using the spelling "fish and chips shop" for the pronunciation [fɪʃn̩t͡ʃɪpʃɒp]. I think the use of the spelling "fish and chip shop" is based mainly on grammar, not on phonetics.
*Some exceptions to this tendency are mentioned in the answer here: Singular/plural Nouns as Adjectives
add a comment |
"Attributive nouns" or the first elements of compound nouns tend to be singular in form
There is no absolute rule forbidding the use of a plural noun in the first part of a compound, but it is more usual in general to use the singular form.* "Fish and chip(s) shop" doesn't seem to be an exception to this tendency.
The Google Ngram Viewer suggests that both forms exist, but that "fish and chip shop" is more common than "fish and chips shop":
I don't think phonetics is an important factor
Some comments have brought up the supposed phonetic indistiguishability of "fish and chip shop" and "fish and chips shop", but I can't see how that could determine the spelling one way or another: even if it is true that nobody ever pronounces these any differently in practice (which I rather doubt), that wouldn't prevent people from using the spelling "fish and chips shop" for the pronunciation [fɪʃn̩t͡ʃɪpʃɒp]. I think the use of the spelling "fish and chip shop" is based mainly on grammar, not on phonetics.
*Some exceptions to this tendency are mentioned in the answer here: Singular/plural Nouns as Adjectives
"Attributive nouns" or the first elements of compound nouns tend to be singular in form
There is no absolute rule forbidding the use of a plural noun in the first part of a compound, but it is more usual in general to use the singular form.* "Fish and chip(s) shop" doesn't seem to be an exception to this tendency.
The Google Ngram Viewer suggests that both forms exist, but that "fish and chip shop" is more common than "fish and chips shop":
I don't think phonetics is an important factor
Some comments have brought up the supposed phonetic indistiguishability of "fish and chip shop" and "fish and chips shop", but I can't see how that could determine the spelling one way or another: even if it is true that nobody ever pronounces these any differently in practice (which I rather doubt), that wouldn't prevent people from using the spelling "fish and chips shop" for the pronunciation [fɪʃn̩t͡ʃɪpʃɒp]. I think the use of the spelling "fish and chip shop" is based mainly on grammar, not on phonetics.
*Some exceptions to this tendency are mentioned in the answer here: Singular/plural Nouns as Adjectives
edited 2 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
sumelicsumelic
48.3k8114219
48.3k8114219
add a comment |
add a comment |
Either way should be acceptable.
New contributor
2
Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition (linked to the source) and examples of its use. Or if that sounds like too much effort (given the other answers), you can always delete your post. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
7 hours ago
1
This is not just a good start; this is the correct answer. First, because it's for a business, and businesses aren't subject to grammar or usage rules. Second, because there's no difference between Fish and Chips Shop and Fish and Chip Shop in English. Nobody can hear the /s/ at the end of Chips when it comes before the /ʃ/ of Shop. The phrases are identical in pronunciation, and how they are spelled is irrelevant because advertising makes its own rules.
– John Lawler
6 hours ago
2
@John Businesses can name their restaurants any way they want to, but this has nothing to do with businesses or naming. A hat maker is also a business, but that doesn’t mean there’s no reason not to call it a hats maker. Moreover, it’s empirically false that there’s no phonetic distinction between the two – there certainly is in my English. A word-final consonant followed by a homorganic word-initial consonant result in a geminate consonant to me; win no and winnow are not pronounced the same, and nor are chip shop and chips shop.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Either way should be acceptable.
New contributor
2
Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition (linked to the source) and examples of its use. Or if that sounds like too much effort (given the other answers), you can always delete your post. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
7 hours ago
1
This is not just a good start; this is the correct answer. First, because it's for a business, and businesses aren't subject to grammar or usage rules. Second, because there's no difference between Fish and Chips Shop and Fish and Chip Shop in English. Nobody can hear the /s/ at the end of Chips when it comes before the /ʃ/ of Shop. The phrases are identical in pronunciation, and how they are spelled is irrelevant because advertising makes its own rules.
– John Lawler
6 hours ago
2
@John Businesses can name their restaurants any way they want to, but this has nothing to do with businesses or naming. A hat maker is also a business, but that doesn’t mean there’s no reason not to call it a hats maker. Moreover, it’s empirically false that there’s no phonetic distinction between the two – there certainly is in my English. A word-final consonant followed by a homorganic word-initial consonant result in a geminate consonant to me; win no and winnow are not pronounced the same, and nor are chip shop and chips shop.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Either way should be acceptable.
New contributor
Either way should be acceptable.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
Paul WeaverPaul Weaver
191
191
New contributor
New contributor
2
Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition (linked to the source) and examples of its use. Or if that sounds like too much effort (given the other answers), you can always delete your post. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
7 hours ago
1
This is not just a good start; this is the correct answer. First, because it's for a business, and businesses aren't subject to grammar or usage rules. Second, because there's no difference between Fish and Chips Shop and Fish and Chip Shop in English. Nobody can hear the /s/ at the end of Chips when it comes before the /ʃ/ of Shop. The phrases are identical in pronunciation, and how they are spelled is irrelevant because advertising makes its own rules.
– John Lawler
6 hours ago
2
@John Businesses can name their restaurants any way they want to, but this has nothing to do with businesses or naming. A hat maker is also a business, but that doesn’t mean there’s no reason not to call it a hats maker. Moreover, it’s empirically false that there’s no phonetic distinction between the two – there certainly is in my English. A word-final consonant followed by a homorganic word-initial consonant result in a geminate consonant to me; win no and winnow are not pronounced the same, and nor are chip shop and chips shop.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition (linked to the source) and examples of its use. Or if that sounds like too much effort (given the other answers), you can always delete your post. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
7 hours ago
1
This is not just a good start; this is the correct answer. First, because it's for a business, and businesses aren't subject to grammar or usage rules. Second, because there's no difference between Fish and Chips Shop and Fish and Chip Shop in English. Nobody can hear the /s/ at the end of Chips when it comes before the /ʃ/ of Shop. The phrases are identical in pronunciation, and how they are spelled is irrelevant because advertising makes its own rules.
– John Lawler
6 hours ago
2
@John Businesses can name their restaurants any way they want to, but this has nothing to do with businesses or naming. A hat maker is also a business, but that doesn’t mean there’s no reason not to call it a hats maker. Moreover, it’s empirically false that there’s no phonetic distinction between the two – there certainly is in my English. A word-final consonant followed by a homorganic word-initial consonant result in a geminate consonant to me; win no and winnow are not pronounced the same, and nor are chip shop and chips shop.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
5 hours ago
2
2
Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition (linked to the source) and examples of its use. Or if that sounds like too much effort (given the other answers), you can always delete your post. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
7 hours ago
Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition (linked to the source) and examples of its use. Or if that sounds like too much effort (given the other answers), you can always delete your post. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
7 hours ago
1
1
This is not just a good start; this is the correct answer. First, because it's for a business, and businesses aren't subject to grammar or usage rules. Second, because there's no difference between Fish and Chips Shop and Fish and Chip Shop in English. Nobody can hear the /s/ at the end of Chips when it comes before the /ʃ/ of Shop. The phrases are identical in pronunciation, and how they are spelled is irrelevant because advertising makes its own rules.
– John Lawler
6 hours ago
This is not just a good start; this is the correct answer. First, because it's for a business, and businesses aren't subject to grammar or usage rules. Second, because there's no difference between Fish and Chips Shop and Fish and Chip Shop in English. Nobody can hear the /s/ at the end of Chips when it comes before the /ʃ/ of Shop. The phrases are identical in pronunciation, and how they are spelled is irrelevant because advertising makes its own rules.
– John Lawler
6 hours ago
2
2
@John Businesses can name their restaurants any way they want to, but this has nothing to do with businesses or naming. A hat maker is also a business, but that doesn’t mean there’s no reason not to call it a hats maker. Moreover, it’s empirically false that there’s no phonetic distinction between the two – there certainly is in my English. A word-final consonant followed by a homorganic word-initial consonant result in a geminate consonant to me; win no and winnow are not pronounced the same, and nor are chip shop and chips shop.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
5 hours ago
@John Businesses can name their restaurants any way they want to, but this has nothing to do with businesses or naming. A hat maker is also a business, but that doesn’t mean there’s no reason not to call it a hats maker. Moreover, it’s empirically false that there’s no phonetic distinction between the two – there certainly is in my English. A word-final consonant followed by a homorganic word-initial consonant result in a geminate consonant to me; win no and winnow are not pronounced the same, and nor are chip shop and chips shop.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
5 hours ago
add a comment |
When a noun is used as an adjective, it is almost always the singular form, even when the noun is not normally used as a singular. E.g:
- car - car alarm
- house - house key
- trousers - trouser press
- spectacles - spectacle maker
But:
- clothes - clothes line
So, "fish and chips" is the noun phrase, and becomes singular:
- fish and chips - fish and chip shop
"Almost always" may overstate things. A number of exceptions are mentioned in this answer: english.stackexchange.com/a/397244/77227
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic After reading that answer, I'd still advise using the singular as a rule of thumb.
– CJ Dennis
6 hours ago
Right, I agree about that as a rule of thumb, I was just quibbling about the wording "almost always". I'd guess that there are more than a hundred exceptions
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic Mostly always then? ;)
– Jason Bassford
4 hours ago
add a comment |
When a noun is used as an adjective, it is almost always the singular form, even when the noun is not normally used as a singular. E.g:
- car - car alarm
- house - house key
- trousers - trouser press
- spectacles - spectacle maker
But:
- clothes - clothes line
So, "fish and chips" is the noun phrase, and becomes singular:
- fish and chips - fish and chip shop
"Almost always" may overstate things. A number of exceptions are mentioned in this answer: english.stackexchange.com/a/397244/77227
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic After reading that answer, I'd still advise using the singular as a rule of thumb.
– CJ Dennis
6 hours ago
Right, I agree about that as a rule of thumb, I was just quibbling about the wording "almost always". I'd guess that there are more than a hundred exceptions
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic Mostly always then? ;)
– Jason Bassford
4 hours ago
add a comment |
When a noun is used as an adjective, it is almost always the singular form, even when the noun is not normally used as a singular. E.g:
- car - car alarm
- house - house key
- trousers - trouser press
- spectacles - spectacle maker
But:
- clothes - clothes line
So, "fish and chips" is the noun phrase, and becomes singular:
- fish and chips - fish and chip shop
When a noun is used as an adjective, it is almost always the singular form, even when the noun is not normally used as a singular. E.g:
- car - car alarm
- house - house key
- trousers - trouser press
- spectacles - spectacle maker
But:
- clothes - clothes line
So, "fish and chips" is the noun phrase, and becomes singular:
- fish and chips - fish and chip shop
answered 6 hours ago
CJ DennisCJ Dennis
2,03841643
2,03841643
"Almost always" may overstate things. A number of exceptions are mentioned in this answer: english.stackexchange.com/a/397244/77227
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic After reading that answer, I'd still advise using the singular as a rule of thumb.
– CJ Dennis
6 hours ago
Right, I agree about that as a rule of thumb, I was just quibbling about the wording "almost always". I'd guess that there are more than a hundred exceptions
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic Mostly always then? ;)
– Jason Bassford
4 hours ago
add a comment |
"Almost always" may overstate things. A number of exceptions are mentioned in this answer: english.stackexchange.com/a/397244/77227
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic After reading that answer, I'd still advise using the singular as a rule of thumb.
– CJ Dennis
6 hours ago
Right, I agree about that as a rule of thumb, I was just quibbling about the wording "almost always". I'd guess that there are more than a hundred exceptions
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic Mostly always then? ;)
– Jason Bassford
4 hours ago
"Almost always" may overstate things. A number of exceptions are mentioned in this answer: english.stackexchange.com/a/397244/77227
– sumelic
6 hours ago
"Almost always" may overstate things. A number of exceptions are mentioned in this answer: english.stackexchange.com/a/397244/77227
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic After reading that answer, I'd still advise using the singular as a rule of thumb.
– CJ Dennis
6 hours ago
@sumelic After reading that answer, I'd still advise using the singular as a rule of thumb.
– CJ Dennis
6 hours ago
Right, I agree about that as a rule of thumb, I was just quibbling about the wording "almost always". I'd guess that there are more than a hundred exceptions
– sumelic
6 hours ago
Right, I agree about that as a rule of thumb, I was just quibbling about the wording "almost always". I'd guess that there are more than a hundred exceptions
– sumelic
6 hours ago
@sumelic Mostly always then? ;)
– Jason Bassford
4 hours ago
@sumelic Mostly always then? ;)
– Jason Bassford
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Larry Hopkins is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Larry Hopkins is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Larry Hopkins is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Larry Hopkins is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484719%2ffish-and-chips-shop-or-fish-and-chip-shop%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e) {
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom)) {
StackExchange.using('gps', function() { StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', { location: 'question_page' }); });
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
}
};
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"Fish" is plural like "people". On the other hand if you describe several kinds of fish or people you can use "fishes" and "peoples".
– Rusty Core
13 hours ago
@RustyCore we very rarely say "fishes" and I have absolutely never seen a "fishes" shop.
– Weather Vane
13 hours ago
Does this mean I'm wrong in describing someone as a meat and potatoes guy? I've always used the the plural potatoes.
– Larry Hopkins
12 hours ago
Larry that refers to a dish he likes rather than a shop.
– Weather Vane
10 hours ago
1
If the term were "fish and chips shop", the extra "s" would decay rapidly because few people would take the time to clearly enunciate it separately from the "s" in "shop".
– Boann
9 hours ago