A dog followed the man into the store












1
















A dog followed the man into the store.




Is it only me who thinks the sentence above means both?




  1. A dog was walking behind the man into the store.

  2. The man got into the store by the following of a dog.


I think it's possible the sentence means both, although the second version sounds very weird, but anyways, it can be interpreted the 2nd way.






sentence-meaning







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    We use the verb lead (past tense led) to express your second meaning, where the dog is guiding the man. The dog led the man into the store. As StoneyB says in his answer, follow someone never means "cause someone to be led".

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    3 hours ago













  • No, it can't be interpreted the second way . . .

    – Jason Bassford
    1 hour ago


















1
















A dog followed the man into the store.




Is it only me who thinks the sentence above means both?




  1. A dog was walking behind the man into the store.

  2. The man got into the store by the following of a dog.


I think it's possible the sentence means both, although the second version sounds very weird, but anyways, it can be interpreted the 2nd way.






sentence-meaning







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    We use the verb lead (past tense led) to express your second meaning, where the dog is guiding the man. The dog led the man into the store. As StoneyB says in his answer, follow someone never means "cause someone to be led".

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    3 hours ago













  • No, it can't be interpreted the second way . . .

    – Jason Bassford
    1 hour ago
















1












1








1









A dog followed the man into the store.




Is it only me who thinks the sentence above means both?




  1. A dog was walking behind the man into the store.

  2. The man got into the store by the following of a dog.


I think it's possible the sentence means both, although the second version sounds very weird, but anyways, it can be interpreted the 2nd way.






sentence-meaning







share|improve this question

















A dog followed the man into the store.




Is it only me who thinks the sentence above means both?




  1. A dog was walking behind the man into the store.

  2. The man got into the store by the following of a dog.


I think it's possible the sentence means both, although the second version sounds very weird, but anyways, it can be interpreted the 2nd way.






sentence-meaning




sentence-meaning






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









RubioRic

4,2181933




4,2181933










asked 5 hours ago









SISSIS

6121720




6121720








  • 1





    We use the verb lead (past tense led) to express your second meaning, where the dog is guiding the man. The dog led the man into the store. As StoneyB says in his answer, follow someone never means "cause someone to be led".

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    3 hours ago













  • No, it can't be interpreted the second way . . .

    – Jason Bassford
    1 hour ago
















  • 1





    We use the verb lead (past tense led) to express your second meaning, where the dog is guiding the man. The dog led the man into the store. As StoneyB says in his answer, follow someone never means "cause someone to be led".

    – Tᴚoɯɐuo
    3 hours ago













  • No, it can't be interpreted the second way . . .

    – Jason Bassford
    1 hour ago










1




1





We use the verb lead (past tense led) to express your second meaning, where the dog is guiding the man. The dog led the man into the store. As StoneyB says in his answer, follow someone never means "cause someone to be led".

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
3 hours ago







We use the verb lead (past tense led) to express your second meaning, where the dog is guiding the man. The dog led the man into the store. As StoneyB says in his answer, follow someone never means "cause someone to be led".

– Tᴚoɯɐuo
3 hours ago















No, it can't be interpreted the second way . . .

– Jason Bassford
1 hour ago







No, it can't be interpreted the second way . . .

– Jason Bassford
1 hour ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6














Your conjecture is invalid.



Follow takes an object and an optional locative complement designating the destination or path of movement. But it never has a causative sense: the subject does not cause the object to move.






share|improve this answer
























  • Is the reason my conjecture is invalid just that the 2nd doesn't make sense?

    – SIS
    2 hours ago











  • @SIS It is invalid and the second "doesn't make sense" because follow never has the causative meaning which you attribute to it.

    – StoneyB
    1 hour ago











  • Maybe the dog chased the man into the store?

    – Michael Harvey
    19 mins ago





















4














I don't know what you mean by the second sentence, it makes no sense to me. The sentence you are asking about means: a man walks into the store and is followed by a dog. The dog is walking behind the man.






share|improve this answer
























  • I think the 2nd interpretation can be possible if we think "to be" is implied as in "A dog followed the man (to be) into the store".

    – SIS
    4 hours ago











  • The " to be " makes no sense, just say: the dog followed the man into the store.

    – anouk
    4 hours ago











  • Yes, I know it doesn't make sense at all, but I just suggest another possible interpretation with the perspective.

    – SIS
    4 hours ago



















3














You are correct that your second sentence "sounds very weird". That is because it makes no sense. It seems to suggest that the man somehow got into the store (was allowed to enter) because he followed the dog, which is just plain crazy, unless the shop only allows humans to enter if a dog goes in first. Maybe you mean "the man went into the store, followed by the dog". We can use "follow" two ways: to literally move along behind someone or something, whether deliberately or not, e.g. the car followed a truck, I followed my sister into the kitchen, or it can mean to happen after something else, e.g. New Year follows Christmas, the fight was followed by the arrival of the police.



Follow






share|improve this answer
























  • Follow also means keep track of. As in I'm following that news story. (Although that meaning has nothing to do with physical location.)

    – Jason Bassford
    1 hour ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193363%2fa-dog-followed-the-man-into-the-store%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














Your conjecture is invalid.



Follow takes an object and an optional locative complement designating the destination or path of movement. But it never has a causative sense: the subject does not cause the object to move.






share|improve this answer
























  • Is the reason my conjecture is invalid just that the 2nd doesn't make sense?

    – SIS
    2 hours ago











  • @SIS It is invalid and the second "doesn't make sense" because follow never has the causative meaning which you attribute to it.

    – StoneyB
    1 hour ago











  • Maybe the dog chased the man into the store?

    – Michael Harvey
    19 mins ago


















6














Your conjecture is invalid.



Follow takes an object and an optional locative complement designating the destination or path of movement. But it never has a causative sense: the subject does not cause the object to move.






share|improve this answer
























  • Is the reason my conjecture is invalid just that the 2nd doesn't make sense?

    – SIS
    2 hours ago











  • @SIS It is invalid and the second "doesn't make sense" because follow never has the causative meaning which you attribute to it.

    – StoneyB
    1 hour ago











  • Maybe the dog chased the man into the store?

    – Michael Harvey
    19 mins ago
















6












6








6







Your conjecture is invalid.



Follow takes an object and an optional locative complement designating the destination or path of movement. But it never has a causative sense: the subject does not cause the object to move.






share|improve this answer













Your conjecture is invalid.



Follow takes an object and an optional locative complement designating the destination or path of movement. But it never has a causative sense: the subject does not cause the object to move.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









StoneyBStoneyB

169k10231412




169k10231412













  • Is the reason my conjecture is invalid just that the 2nd doesn't make sense?

    – SIS
    2 hours ago











  • @SIS It is invalid and the second "doesn't make sense" because follow never has the causative meaning which you attribute to it.

    – StoneyB
    1 hour ago











  • Maybe the dog chased the man into the store?

    – Michael Harvey
    19 mins ago





















  • Is the reason my conjecture is invalid just that the 2nd doesn't make sense?

    – SIS
    2 hours ago











  • @SIS It is invalid and the second "doesn't make sense" because follow never has the causative meaning which you attribute to it.

    – StoneyB
    1 hour ago











  • Maybe the dog chased the man into the store?

    – Michael Harvey
    19 mins ago



















Is the reason my conjecture is invalid just that the 2nd doesn't make sense?

– SIS
2 hours ago





Is the reason my conjecture is invalid just that the 2nd doesn't make sense?

– SIS
2 hours ago













@SIS It is invalid and the second "doesn't make sense" because follow never has the causative meaning which you attribute to it.

– StoneyB
1 hour ago





@SIS It is invalid and the second "doesn't make sense" because follow never has the causative meaning which you attribute to it.

– StoneyB
1 hour ago













Maybe the dog chased the man into the store?

– Michael Harvey
19 mins ago







Maybe the dog chased the man into the store?

– Michael Harvey
19 mins ago















4














I don't know what you mean by the second sentence, it makes no sense to me. The sentence you are asking about means: a man walks into the store and is followed by a dog. The dog is walking behind the man.






share|improve this answer
























  • I think the 2nd interpretation can be possible if we think "to be" is implied as in "A dog followed the man (to be) into the store".

    – SIS
    4 hours ago











  • The " to be " makes no sense, just say: the dog followed the man into the store.

    – anouk
    4 hours ago











  • Yes, I know it doesn't make sense at all, but I just suggest another possible interpretation with the perspective.

    – SIS
    4 hours ago
















4














I don't know what you mean by the second sentence, it makes no sense to me. The sentence you are asking about means: a man walks into the store and is followed by a dog. The dog is walking behind the man.






share|improve this answer
























  • I think the 2nd interpretation can be possible if we think "to be" is implied as in "A dog followed the man (to be) into the store".

    – SIS
    4 hours ago











  • The " to be " makes no sense, just say: the dog followed the man into the store.

    – anouk
    4 hours ago











  • Yes, I know it doesn't make sense at all, but I just suggest another possible interpretation with the perspective.

    – SIS
    4 hours ago














4












4








4







I don't know what you mean by the second sentence, it makes no sense to me. The sentence you are asking about means: a man walks into the store and is followed by a dog. The dog is walking behind the man.






share|improve this answer













I don't know what you mean by the second sentence, it makes no sense to me. The sentence you are asking about means: a man walks into the store and is followed by a dog. The dog is walking behind the man.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









anoukanouk

1,189312




1,189312













  • I think the 2nd interpretation can be possible if we think "to be" is implied as in "A dog followed the man (to be) into the store".

    – SIS
    4 hours ago











  • The " to be " makes no sense, just say: the dog followed the man into the store.

    – anouk
    4 hours ago











  • Yes, I know it doesn't make sense at all, but I just suggest another possible interpretation with the perspective.

    – SIS
    4 hours ago



















  • I think the 2nd interpretation can be possible if we think "to be" is implied as in "A dog followed the man (to be) into the store".

    – SIS
    4 hours ago











  • The " to be " makes no sense, just say: the dog followed the man into the store.

    – anouk
    4 hours ago











  • Yes, I know it doesn't make sense at all, but I just suggest another possible interpretation with the perspective.

    – SIS
    4 hours ago

















I think the 2nd interpretation can be possible if we think "to be" is implied as in "A dog followed the man (to be) into the store".

– SIS
4 hours ago





I think the 2nd interpretation can be possible if we think "to be" is implied as in "A dog followed the man (to be) into the store".

– SIS
4 hours ago













The " to be " makes no sense, just say: the dog followed the man into the store.

– anouk
4 hours ago





The " to be " makes no sense, just say: the dog followed the man into the store.

– anouk
4 hours ago













Yes, I know it doesn't make sense at all, but I just suggest another possible interpretation with the perspective.

– SIS
4 hours ago





Yes, I know it doesn't make sense at all, but I just suggest another possible interpretation with the perspective.

– SIS
4 hours ago











3














You are correct that your second sentence "sounds very weird". That is because it makes no sense. It seems to suggest that the man somehow got into the store (was allowed to enter) because he followed the dog, which is just plain crazy, unless the shop only allows humans to enter if a dog goes in first. Maybe you mean "the man went into the store, followed by the dog". We can use "follow" two ways: to literally move along behind someone or something, whether deliberately or not, e.g. the car followed a truck, I followed my sister into the kitchen, or it can mean to happen after something else, e.g. New Year follows Christmas, the fight was followed by the arrival of the police.



Follow






share|improve this answer
























  • Follow also means keep track of. As in I'm following that news story. (Although that meaning has nothing to do with physical location.)

    – Jason Bassford
    1 hour ago


















3














You are correct that your second sentence "sounds very weird". That is because it makes no sense. It seems to suggest that the man somehow got into the store (was allowed to enter) because he followed the dog, which is just plain crazy, unless the shop only allows humans to enter if a dog goes in first. Maybe you mean "the man went into the store, followed by the dog". We can use "follow" two ways: to literally move along behind someone or something, whether deliberately or not, e.g. the car followed a truck, I followed my sister into the kitchen, or it can mean to happen after something else, e.g. New Year follows Christmas, the fight was followed by the arrival of the police.



Follow






share|improve this answer
























  • Follow also means keep track of. As in I'm following that news story. (Although that meaning has nothing to do with physical location.)

    – Jason Bassford
    1 hour ago
















3












3








3







You are correct that your second sentence "sounds very weird". That is because it makes no sense. It seems to suggest that the man somehow got into the store (was allowed to enter) because he followed the dog, which is just plain crazy, unless the shop only allows humans to enter if a dog goes in first. Maybe you mean "the man went into the store, followed by the dog". We can use "follow" two ways: to literally move along behind someone or something, whether deliberately or not, e.g. the car followed a truck, I followed my sister into the kitchen, or it can mean to happen after something else, e.g. New Year follows Christmas, the fight was followed by the arrival of the police.



Follow






share|improve this answer













You are correct that your second sentence "sounds very weird". That is because it makes no sense. It seems to suggest that the man somehow got into the store (was allowed to enter) because he followed the dog, which is just plain crazy, unless the shop only allows humans to enter if a dog goes in first. Maybe you mean "the man went into the store, followed by the dog". We can use "follow" two ways: to literally move along behind someone or something, whether deliberately or not, e.g. the car followed a truck, I followed my sister into the kitchen, or it can mean to happen after something else, e.g. New Year follows Christmas, the fight was followed by the arrival of the police.



Follow







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









Michael HarveyMichael Harvey

13.2k11330




13.2k11330













  • Follow also means keep track of. As in I'm following that news story. (Although that meaning has nothing to do with physical location.)

    – Jason Bassford
    1 hour ago





















  • Follow also means keep track of. As in I'm following that news story. (Although that meaning has nothing to do with physical location.)

    – Jason Bassford
    1 hour ago



















Follow also means keep track of. As in I'm following that news story. (Although that meaning has nothing to do with physical location.)

– Jason Bassford
1 hour ago







Follow also means keep track of. As in I'm following that news story. (Although that meaning has nothing to do with physical location.)

– Jason Bassford
1 hour ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193363%2fa-dog-followed-the-man-into-the-store%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Magento 2 controller redirect on button click in phtml file

Image
0 I want to redirect customer using controller when button is clicked in one of my phtml files. So far I got, controller: public function execute(){ return $this->addToCart(); } public function addToCart(){ // some logic $this->_redirect('checkout/cart/index'); } The above is working fine (redirecting) when you access the controller via URL (www.mydomain.com/batchorder/index/addtocart). And here is my .phtml file: $("#addToCart").click(function(){ let controllerUrl = "<?php echo $block-getUrl('batchorder/index/addtocart'); ?>" $.post(controllerUrl, { "products": JSON.stringify(sideCart.SideCartProducts) }) The post request returns my logic as it should, however, it is not redirecting. Anyone can help? ...
Read more

Polycentropodidae

Image
Polycentropodidae Plectrocnemia conspersa Siyentipiko nga pagklasipika Ginhadi-an: Animalia Phylum: Arthropoda Ubosphylum: Hexapoda Klase: Insecta Orden: Trichoptera Labawbanay: Hydropsychoidea Banay: Polycentropodidae Binomial nga ngaran Polycentropodidae An Polycentropodidae [1] in uska familia han Insecta. An Polycentropodidae in nahilalakip ha familia nga Hydropsychoidea, ordo nga Trichoptera, classis nga Insecta, punoan nga Arthropoda, ngan regnum nga Animalia. [1] An familia nga Polycentropodidae in naglalakip hin 660 ka mga species, sumala ha Catalogue of Life [1] . An kladograma hini sumala ha Catalogue of Life [1] : Hydropsychoidea   Polycentropodidae  Adectophylax Antillopsyche Cernotina Cyrnellus Cyrnodes Cyrnopsis Cyrnus Eodipseudopsis Eoneureclipsis Holocentropus Kambaitipsyche Neucentropus ...
Read more