Is 'bad luck' with former employees a red flag?












36















I applied for an engineering position at a medium-sized* but international company. During the first interview, I got the impression that their tech stack does not quite match the public job description (nor my interests). So I expressed no further interest in the position.



However, they sent me a really nice message that they liked my profile and that they would like to stay in touch. That made me change my mind, and I had a second interview/meeting with the department head, which clarified my doubts.



We agreed that I would take a day off of my current job, so I could visit the company for a whole day, get to know some people, complete 1-2 basic tasks to get to know their workflow. Apparently, that day went well, because the following week, their hiring manager contacted me with an offer.



He told me (during a phone call) that he would send me a contract and we could possibly sign it next week. However, a few hours later, the hiring manager sent me a message that the company CEO would like to arrange another meeting in person.



The hiring manager wrote explicitly that this was unusual procedure for them, but that they "had bad luck with employees in the past". However, upon request, he also told me that they had no doubts that I would be qualified for the position.



I'm not sure what this CEO meeting is all about. Both the department manager and the hiring manager told me that they had far less qualified** people start working for them in the past and. If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to make sure everything is OK with the company?



Background: The department manager told me that last year, one of their developers quit their job (he didn't mention why, but I think someone changing their job is nothing unusual), and that they had to cancel their contract with another developer during probation, because he refused to work with the tools and frameworks they provided (which doesn't apply to me).



*There are more than 50 employees at multiple locations, at least half of them at the office where I'm applying. The CEO/founder is no longer involved in software development. He developed an early version of their product, though. The hiring manager seems to have further, higher level responsibilities besides hiring, although I'm not sure what exactly. There seems to be no separate HR department, which I find odd for a company of this size.



**I was told that some of the current engineers had basically no experience with the tech being used, and gained the relevant experience during their first months in the company. (The tech is not top-notch, but not antique either. I guess it's a matter of personal preference.) The fact that they had positive experience with less qualified people makes their behavior even more puzzling to me.










share|improve this question









New contributor




cmonk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7





    Please clarify what is the size of the company. I once interviewed for a company with no RH, and 7 employees. My boss was the CTO and both he and the CEO were present during the personal interview. Along with the CMO, they were the co-founders of the company. Made all the sense to me that the CEO would be present.

    – Mefitico
    10 hours ago






  • 3





    "had bad luck with employees in the past" - You should have asked what he meant by that because it can mean any number of things from "our hiring process is flawed" or "we expect people to work 60 hour weeks" to "our culture is toxic". You could still ask the person who told you that but it's also a question you can ask this CEO. Whether it's a red flag depends on info you don't have yet. Did you not press further when you heard this?

    – Lilienthal
    9 hours ago








  • 2





    @Lilienthal Another point to add, it could mean they hired people who appeared more qualified than they were.

    – Captain Man
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Hey @cmonk I see you (or someone with your same username) proposed an edit to this question. The edit seems to include more details to your post. If this was really you it will be better if you edit your question from the account you posted it.

    – DarkCygnus
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @user87779 Correct, that was just a typo. I meant "unusual procedure".

    – cmonk
    2 hours ago
















36















I applied for an engineering position at a medium-sized* but international company. During the first interview, I got the impression that their tech stack does not quite match the public job description (nor my interests). So I expressed no further interest in the position.



However, they sent me a really nice message that they liked my profile and that they would like to stay in touch. That made me change my mind, and I had a second interview/meeting with the department head, which clarified my doubts.



We agreed that I would take a day off of my current job, so I could visit the company for a whole day, get to know some people, complete 1-2 basic tasks to get to know their workflow. Apparently, that day went well, because the following week, their hiring manager contacted me with an offer.



He told me (during a phone call) that he would send me a contract and we could possibly sign it next week. However, a few hours later, the hiring manager sent me a message that the company CEO would like to arrange another meeting in person.



The hiring manager wrote explicitly that this was unusual procedure for them, but that they "had bad luck with employees in the past". However, upon request, he also told me that they had no doubts that I would be qualified for the position.



I'm not sure what this CEO meeting is all about. Both the department manager and the hiring manager told me that they had far less qualified** people start working for them in the past and. If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to make sure everything is OK with the company?



Background: The department manager told me that last year, one of their developers quit their job (he didn't mention why, but I think someone changing their job is nothing unusual), and that they had to cancel their contract with another developer during probation, because he refused to work with the tools and frameworks they provided (which doesn't apply to me).



*There are more than 50 employees at multiple locations, at least half of them at the office where I'm applying. The CEO/founder is no longer involved in software development. He developed an early version of their product, though. The hiring manager seems to have further, higher level responsibilities besides hiring, although I'm not sure what exactly. There seems to be no separate HR department, which I find odd for a company of this size.



**I was told that some of the current engineers had basically no experience with the tech being used, and gained the relevant experience during their first months in the company. (The tech is not top-notch, but not antique either. I guess it's a matter of personal preference.) The fact that they had positive experience with less qualified people makes their behavior even more puzzling to me.










share|improve this question









New contributor




cmonk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7





    Please clarify what is the size of the company. I once interviewed for a company with no RH, and 7 employees. My boss was the CTO and both he and the CEO were present during the personal interview. Along with the CMO, they were the co-founders of the company. Made all the sense to me that the CEO would be present.

    – Mefitico
    10 hours ago






  • 3





    "had bad luck with employees in the past" - You should have asked what he meant by that because it can mean any number of things from "our hiring process is flawed" or "we expect people to work 60 hour weeks" to "our culture is toxic". You could still ask the person who told you that but it's also a question you can ask this CEO. Whether it's a red flag depends on info you don't have yet. Did you not press further when you heard this?

    – Lilienthal
    9 hours ago








  • 2





    @Lilienthal Another point to add, it could mean they hired people who appeared more qualified than they were.

    – Captain Man
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Hey @cmonk I see you (or someone with your same username) proposed an edit to this question. The edit seems to include more details to your post. If this was really you it will be better if you edit your question from the account you posted it.

    – DarkCygnus
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @user87779 Correct, that was just a typo. I meant "unusual procedure".

    – cmonk
    2 hours ago














36












36








36


2






I applied for an engineering position at a medium-sized* but international company. During the first interview, I got the impression that their tech stack does not quite match the public job description (nor my interests). So I expressed no further interest in the position.



However, they sent me a really nice message that they liked my profile and that they would like to stay in touch. That made me change my mind, and I had a second interview/meeting with the department head, which clarified my doubts.



We agreed that I would take a day off of my current job, so I could visit the company for a whole day, get to know some people, complete 1-2 basic tasks to get to know their workflow. Apparently, that day went well, because the following week, their hiring manager contacted me with an offer.



He told me (during a phone call) that he would send me a contract and we could possibly sign it next week. However, a few hours later, the hiring manager sent me a message that the company CEO would like to arrange another meeting in person.



The hiring manager wrote explicitly that this was unusual procedure for them, but that they "had bad luck with employees in the past". However, upon request, he also told me that they had no doubts that I would be qualified for the position.



I'm not sure what this CEO meeting is all about. Both the department manager and the hiring manager told me that they had far less qualified** people start working for them in the past and. If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to make sure everything is OK with the company?



Background: The department manager told me that last year, one of their developers quit their job (he didn't mention why, but I think someone changing their job is nothing unusual), and that they had to cancel their contract with another developer during probation, because he refused to work with the tools and frameworks they provided (which doesn't apply to me).



*There are more than 50 employees at multiple locations, at least half of them at the office where I'm applying. The CEO/founder is no longer involved in software development. He developed an early version of their product, though. The hiring manager seems to have further, higher level responsibilities besides hiring, although I'm not sure what exactly. There seems to be no separate HR department, which I find odd for a company of this size.



**I was told that some of the current engineers had basically no experience with the tech being used, and gained the relevant experience during their first months in the company. (The tech is not top-notch, but not antique either. I guess it's a matter of personal preference.) The fact that they had positive experience with less qualified people makes their behavior even more puzzling to me.










share|improve this question









New contributor




cmonk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I applied for an engineering position at a medium-sized* but international company. During the first interview, I got the impression that their tech stack does not quite match the public job description (nor my interests). So I expressed no further interest in the position.



However, they sent me a really nice message that they liked my profile and that they would like to stay in touch. That made me change my mind, and I had a second interview/meeting with the department head, which clarified my doubts.



We agreed that I would take a day off of my current job, so I could visit the company for a whole day, get to know some people, complete 1-2 basic tasks to get to know their workflow. Apparently, that day went well, because the following week, their hiring manager contacted me with an offer.



He told me (during a phone call) that he would send me a contract and we could possibly sign it next week. However, a few hours later, the hiring manager sent me a message that the company CEO would like to arrange another meeting in person.



The hiring manager wrote explicitly that this was unusual procedure for them, but that they "had bad luck with employees in the past". However, upon request, he also told me that they had no doubts that I would be qualified for the position.



I'm not sure what this CEO meeting is all about. Both the department manager and the hiring manager told me that they had far less qualified** people start working for them in the past and. If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to make sure everything is OK with the company?



Background: The department manager told me that last year, one of their developers quit their job (he didn't mention why, but I think someone changing their job is nothing unusual), and that they had to cancel their contract with another developer during probation, because he refused to work with the tools and frameworks they provided (which doesn't apply to me).



*There are more than 50 employees at multiple locations, at least half of them at the office where I'm applying. The CEO/founder is no longer involved in software development. He developed an early version of their product, though. The hiring manager seems to have further, higher level responsibilities besides hiring, although I'm not sure what exactly. There seems to be no separate HR department, which I find odd for a company of this size.



**I was told that some of the current engineers had basically no experience with the tech being used, and gained the relevant experience during their first months in the company. (The tech is not top-notch, but not antique either. I guess it's a matter of personal preference.) The fact that they had positive experience with less qualified people makes their behavior even more puzzling to me.







interviewing job-offer new-job






share|improve this question









New contributor




cmonk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




cmonk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







cmonk













New contributor




cmonk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 15 hours ago









cmonkcmonk

18826




18826




New contributor




cmonk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





cmonk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






cmonk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 7





    Please clarify what is the size of the company. I once interviewed for a company with no RH, and 7 employees. My boss was the CTO and both he and the CEO were present during the personal interview. Along with the CMO, they were the co-founders of the company. Made all the sense to me that the CEO would be present.

    – Mefitico
    10 hours ago






  • 3





    "had bad luck with employees in the past" - You should have asked what he meant by that because it can mean any number of things from "our hiring process is flawed" or "we expect people to work 60 hour weeks" to "our culture is toxic". You could still ask the person who told you that but it's also a question you can ask this CEO. Whether it's a red flag depends on info you don't have yet. Did you not press further when you heard this?

    – Lilienthal
    9 hours ago








  • 2





    @Lilienthal Another point to add, it could mean they hired people who appeared more qualified than they were.

    – Captain Man
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Hey @cmonk I see you (or someone with your same username) proposed an edit to this question. The edit seems to include more details to your post. If this was really you it will be better if you edit your question from the account you posted it.

    – DarkCygnus
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @user87779 Correct, that was just a typo. I meant "unusual procedure".

    – cmonk
    2 hours ago














  • 7





    Please clarify what is the size of the company. I once interviewed for a company with no RH, and 7 employees. My boss was the CTO and both he and the CEO were present during the personal interview. Along with the CMO, they were the co-founders of the company. Made all the sense to me that the CEO would be present.

    – Mefitico
    10 hours ago






  • 3





    "had bad luck with employees in the past" - You should have asked what he meant by that because it can mean any number of things from "our hiring process is flawed" or "we expect people to work 60 hour weeks" to "our culture is toxic". You could still ask the person who told you that but it's also a question you can ask this CEO. Whether it's a red flag depends on info you don't have yet. Did you not press further when you heard this?

    – Lilienthal
    9 hours ago








  • 2





    @Lilienthal Another point to add, it could mean they hired people who appeared more qualified than they were.

    – Captain Man
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Hey @cmonk I see you (or someone with your same username) proposed an edit to this question. The edit seems to include more details to your post. If this was really you it will be better if you edit your question from the account you posted it.

    – DarkCygnus
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @user87779 Correct, that was just a typo. I meant "unusual procedure".

    – cmonk
    2 hours ago








7




7





Please clarify what is the size of the company. I once interviewed for a company with no RH, and 7 employees. My boss was the CTO and both he and the CEO were present during the personal interview. Along with the CMO, they were the co-founders of the company. Made all the sense to me that the CEO would be present.

– Mefitico
10 hours ago





Please clarify what is the size of the company. I once interviewed for a company with no RH, and 7 employees. My boss was the CTO and both he and the CEO were present during the personal interview. Along with the CMO, they were the co-founders of the company. Made all the sense to me that the CEO would be present.

– Mefitico
10 hours ago




3




3





"had bad luck with employees in the past" - You should have asked what he meant by that because it can mean any number of things from "our hiring process is flawed" or "we expect people to work 60 hour weeks" to "our culture is toxic". You could still ask the person who told you that but it's also a question you can ask this CEO. Whether it's a red flag depends on info you don't have yet. Did you not press further when you heard this?

– Lilienthal
9 hours ago







"had bad luck with employees in the past" - You should have asked what he meant by that because it can mean any number of things from "our hiring process is flawed" or "we expect people to work 60 hour weeks" to "our culture is toxic". You could still ask the person who told you that but it's also a question you can ask this CEO. Whether it's a red flag depends on info you don't have yet. Did you not press further when you heard this?

– Lilienthal
9 hours ago






2




2





@Lilienthal Another point to add, it could mean they hired people who appeared more qualified than they were.

– Captain Man
7 hours ago





@Lilienthal Another point to add, it could mean they hired people who appeared more qualified than they were.

– Captain Man
7 hours ago




2




2





Hey @cmonk I see you (or someone with your same username) proposed an edit to this question. The edit seems to include more details to your post. If this was really you it will be better if you edit your question from the account you posted it.

– DarkCygnus
3 hours ago





Hey @cmonk I see you (or someone with your same username) proposed an edit to this question. The edit seems to include more details to your post. If this was really you it will be better if you edit your question from the account you posted it.

– DarkCygnus
3 hours ago




1




1





@user87779 Correct, that was just a typo. I meant "unusual procedure".

– cmonk
2 hours ago





@user87779 Correct, that was just a typo. I meant "unusual procedure".

– cmonk
2 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















36















If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to
make sure everything is OK with the company?




Start with something like: "So I have been told that meeting with you was an unusual procedure, but that you have had bad luck with employees in the past. Tell me about that."



Then you see where that leads and ask follow-up questions as appropriate.






share|improve this answer



















  • 4





    Great answer. Given that the company is actively recruiting OP, it sounds like he's in a position of some negotiating power and has doubts, so I think this is a great suggestion. An interview always goes both ways. Good reminder of that!

    – bob
    3 hours ago






  • 7





    Plus it shows maturity and confidence which are good things.

    – bob
    3 hours ago



















72














It's a red flag in that it indicates two things:




  • the CEO is jumpy about people leaving and a sign that people at the company aren't readily replaceable, which probably means they need an off-the-beaten-path skill set. A developer quitting during probation over the tools and frameworks sounds like he was bait-and-switched, and you've already said that the tech stack doesn't sound like what was advertised to you either.


  • the CEO doesn't trust the judgement of his hiring managers and has to "just make sure". This could be a sign that he interferes in other areas as well.



Neither of these is necessarily a deal-breaker, but if you do continue, proceed with caution.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3





    A CEO that doesn't trust their employees at a place where the people have knowledge that isn't shared sounds like pretty much the worst place to be imaginable.

    – UKMonkey
    8 hours ago



















19















I'm not sure what this CEO meeting is all about




You'll only find out after the meeting happens, from the given context, it's not too clear.




The hiring manager wrote explicitly that this was unusual procedure for them, but that hey "had bad luck with employees in the past". However, upon request, he also told me that they had no doubts that I would be qualified for the position.




I believe this happens for either of two reasons:




  • The Hiring manager is trying to get an explicit approval from CEO for your joining (and terms and condition) because it might have happened that both the earlier engineers who left were hired by this very hiring manager and this time he is trying to convince the CEO that is is not because of him that the conflicts happened at a later time.


  • The CEO wants to ensure that you take the job, because they think you are a fit for the job, maybe they don't have much options and the CEO wants to add a "personal touch" to the interaction so as you are more inclined to accept the job offer.




If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to make sure everything is OK with the company?




First ask yourself - do you have answers to all the questions you need to know? Are you satisfied with the "guided tour" and organization policies? Are you finally OK with working in that environment (people, policies and tools)? Are you satisfied with the compensation and remuneration proposed?



To sum is up: ask anything, just anything you want to know.






share|improve this answer

































    10














    While it may be unusual, it is not necessarily a bad sign. Stranger things have happened without anything negative happening.



    At a previous job of mine, there was a famous story about one guy. During his first day at work he asked for permission to go to the pharmacy, permission was granted, he left and he never returned.



    After this kind of experience, a company may adjust some of their procedures.



    Just look at the situation overall:




    • Is everything OK?


    • Are there other red flags?


    • Do you really want to work there?


    • Do you have other questions which you did not ask? (about frameworks, tools, deadlines, staff...). This would be a good opportunity to ask those question. Do not be afraid to ask questions.



    You may even ask for some details about the guy who quit during the previous year. Even make a joke, imply that you may want to quit also, in similar conditions.



    If they are friendly and the corporate culture is good, everything will be fine. If not, you may learn a lesson.






    share|improve this answer
























    • Did he mean to take permission to work at a pharmacy or buy some medicine? Strange. I don't know why someone would need permission to go to a pharmacy. You either go or inform and then go.

      – Sufian
      11 hours ago






    • 2





      The company was IT - where he just started to work. Since it was during work-hours, he had to ask permission - it was merely a formality, the work environment was very friendly, and several pharmacies were available within a 5-minute walk. He claimed he wanted to buy some medicine (something irrelevant, maybe aspirin). Why ask permission? It is strictly related to the rules of the company (maybe laws also, safety related) - but ultimately, it is just polite to do that.

      – virolino
      11 hours ago



















    3














    Because the last person left when they refused to use the tools / framework it would be worth finding out if the other people who left went for the same reason.



    If you have no problem working with old / unusual tech then it may not be an issue for you.



    I think I'd also be asking to see a copy of the contract before handing in my notice with my current employer in case there's any show stoppers in there.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "423"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: false,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      cmonk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129380%2fis-bad-luck-with-former-employees-a-red-flag%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown




















      StackExchange.ready(function () {
      $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
      var showEditor = function() {
      $("#show-editor-button").hide();
      $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
      StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
      };

      var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
      if(useFancy == 'True') {
      var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
      var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
      var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

      $(this).loadPopup({
      url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
      loaded: function(popup) {
      var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
      var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
      var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

      pTitle.text(popupTitle);
      pBody.html(popupBody);
      pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
      }
      })
      } else{
      var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
      if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
      showEditor();
      }
      }
      });
      });






      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      36















      If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to
      make sure everything is OK with the company?




      Start with something like: "So I have been told that meeting with you was an unusual procedure, but that you have had bad luck with employees in the past. Tell me about that."



      Then you see where that leads and ask follow-up questions as appropriate.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 4





        Great answer. Given that the company is actively recruiting OP, it sounds like he's in a position of some negotiating power and has doubts, so I think this is a great suggestion. An interview always goes both ways. Good reminder of that!

        – bob
        3 hours ago






      • 7





        Plus it shows maturity and confidence which are good things.

        – bob
        3 hours ago
















      36















      If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to
      make sure everything is OK with the company?




      Start with something like: "So I have been told that meeting with you was an unusual procedure, but that you have had bad luck with employees in the past. Tell me about that."



      Then you see where that leads and ask follow-up questions as appropriate.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 4





        Great answer. Given that the company is actively recruiting OP, it sounds like he's in a position of some negotiating power and has doubts, so I think this is a great suggestion. An interview always goes both ways. Good reminder of that!

        – bob
        3 hours ago






      • 7





        Plus it shows maturity and confidence which are good things.

        – bob
        3 hours ago














      36












      36








      36








      If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to
      make sure everything is OK with the company?




      Start with something like: "So I have been told that meeting with you was an unusual procedure, but that you have had bad luck with employees in the past. Tell me about that."



      Then you see where that leads and ask follow-up questions as appropriate.






      share|improve this answer














      If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to
      make sure everything is OK with the company?




      Start with something like: "So I have been told that meeting with you was an unusual procedure, but that you have had bad luck with employees in the past. Tell me about that."



      Then you see where that leads and ask follow-up questions as appropriate.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 9 hours ago









      Joe StrazzereJoe Strazzere

      248k1227241027




      248k1227241027








      • 4





        Great answer. Given that the company is actively recruiting OP, it sounds like he's in a position of some negotiating power and has doubts, so I think this is a great suggestion. An interview always goes both ways. Good reminder of that!

        – bob
        3 hours ago






      • 7





        Plus it shows maturity and confidence which are good things.

        – bob
        3 hours ago














      • 4





        Great answer. Given that the company is actively recruiting OP, it sounds like he's in a position of some negotiating power and has doubts, so I think this is a great suggestion. An interview always goes both ways. Good reminder of that!

        – bob
        3 hours ago






      • 7





        Plus it shows maturity and confidence which are good things.

        – bob
        3 hours ago








      4




      4





      Great answer. Given that the company is actively recruiting OP, it sounds like he's in a position of some negotiating power and has doubts, so I think this is a great suggestion. An interview always goes both ways. Good reminder of that!

      – bob
      3 hours ago





      Great answer. Given that the company is actively recruiting OP, it sounds like he's in a position of some negotiating power and has doubts, so I think this is a great suggestion. An interview always goes both ways. Good reminder of that!

      – bob
      3 hours ago




      7




      7





      Plus it shows maturity and confidence which are good things.

      – bob
      3 hours ago





      Plus it shows maturity and confidence which are good things.

      – bob
      3 hours ago













      72














      It's a red flag in that it indicates two things:




      • the CEO is jumpy about people leaving and a sign that people at the company aren't readily replaceable, which probably means they need an off-the-beaten-path skill set. A developer quitting during probation over the tools and frameworks sounds like he was bait-and-switched, and you've already said that the tech stack doesn't sound like what was advertised to you either.


      • the CEO doesn't trust the judgement of his hiring managers and has to "just make sure". This could be a sign that he interferes in other areas as well.



      Neither of these is necessarily a deal-breaker, but if you do continue, proceed with caution.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 3





        A CEO that doesn't trust their employees at a place where the people have knowledge that isn't shared sounds like pretty much the worst place to be imaginable.

        – UKMonkey
        8 hours ago
















      72














      It's a red flag in that it indicates two things:




      • the CEO is jumpy about people leaving and a sign that people at the company aren't readily replaceable, which probably means they need an off-the-beaten-path skill set. A developer quitting during probation over the tools and frameworks sounds like he was bait-and-switched, and you've already said that the tech stack doesn't sound like what was advertised to you either.


      • the CEO doesn't trust the judgement of his hiring managers and has to "just make sure". This could be a sign that he interferes in other areas as well.



      Neither of these is necessarily a deal-breaker, but if you do continue, proceed with caution.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 3





        A CEO that doesn't trust their employees at a place where the people have knowledge that isn't shared sounds like pretty much the worst place to be imaginable.

        – UKMonkey
        8 hours ago














      72












      72








      72







      It's a red flag in that it indicates two things:




      • the CEO is jumpy about people leaving and a sign that people at the company aren't readily replaceable, which probably means they need an off-the-beaten-path skill set. A developer quitting during probation over the tools and frameworks sounds like he was bait-and-switched, and you've already said that the tech stack doesn't sound like what was advertised to you either.


      • the CEO doesn't trust the judgement of his hiring managers and has to "just make sure". This could be a sign that he interferes in other areas as well.



      Neither of these is necessarily a deal-breaker, but if you do continue, proceed with caution.






      share|improve this answer













      It's a red flag in that it indicates two things:




      • the CEO is jumpy about people leaving and a sign that people at the company aren't readily replaceable, which probably means they need an off-the-beaten-path skill set. A developer quitting during probation over the tools and frameworks sounds like he was bait-and-switched, and you've already said that the tech stack doesn't sound like what was advertised to you either.


      • the CEO doesn't trust the judgement of his hiring managers and has to "just make sure". This could be a sign that he interferes in other areas as well.



      Neither of these is necessarily a deal-breaker, but if you do continue, proceed with caution.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 14 hours ago









      Julia HaywardJulia Hayward

      12.6k63639




      12.6k63639








      • 3





        A CEO that doesn't trust their employees at a place where the people have knowledge that isn't shared sounds like pretty much the worst place to be imaginable.

        – UKMonkey
        8 hours ago














      • 3





        A CEO that doesn't trust their employees at a place where the people have knowledge that isn't shared sounds like pretty much the worst place to be imaginable.

        – UKMonkey
        8 hours ago








      3




      3





      A CEO that doesn't trust their employees at a place where the people have knowledge that isn't shared sounds like pretty much the worst place to be imaginable.

      – UKMonkey
      8 hours ago





      A CEO that doesn't trust their employees at a place where the people have knowledge that isn't shared sounds like pretty much the worst place to be imaginable.

      – UKMonkey
      8 hours ago











      19















      I'm not sure what this CEO meeting is all about




      You'll only find out after the meeting happens, from the given context, it's not too clear.




      The hiring manager wrote explicitly that this was unusual procedure for them, but that hey "had bad luck with employees in the past". However, upon request, he also told me that they had no doubts that I would be qualified for the position.




      I believe this happens for either of two reasons:




      • The Hiring manager is trying to get an explicit approval from CEO for your joining (and terms and condition) because it might have happened that both the earlier engineers who left were hired by this very hiring manager and this time he is trying to convince the CEO that is is not because of him that the conflicts happened at a later time.


      • The CEO wants to ensure that you take the job, because they think you are a fit for the job, maybe they don't have much options and the CEO wants to add a "personal touch" to the interaction so as you are more inclined to accept the job offer.




      If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to make sure everything is OK with the company?




      First ask yourself - do you have answers to all the questions you need to know? Are you satisfied with the "guided tour" and organization policies? Are you finally OK with working in that environment (people, policies and tools)? Are you satisfied with the compensation and remuneration proposed?



      To sum is up: ask anything, just anything you want to know.






      share|improve this answer






























        19















        I'm not sure what this CEO meeting is all about




        You'll only find out after the meeting happens, from the given context, it's not too clear.




        The hiring manager wrote explicitly that this was unusual procedure for them, but that hey "had bad luck with employees in the past". However, upon request, he also told me that they had no doubts that I would be qualified for the position.




        I believe this happens for either of two reasons:




        • The Hiring manager is trying to get an explicit approval from CEO for your joining (and terms and condition) because it might have happened that both the earlier engineers who left were hired by this very hiring manager and this time he is trying to convince the CEO that is is not because of him that the conflicts happened at a later time.


        • The CEO wants to ensure that you take the job, because they think you are a fit for the job, maybe they don't have much options and the CEO wants to add a "personal touch" to the interaction so as you are more inclined to accept the job offer.




        If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to make sure everything is OK with the company?




        First ask yourself - do you have answers to all the questions you need to know? Are you satisfied with the "guided tour" and organization policies? Are you finally OK with working in that environment (people, policies and tools)? Are you satisfied with the compensation and remuneration proposed?



        To sum is up: ask anything, just anything you want to know.






        share|improve this answer




























          19












          19








          19








          I'm not sure what this CEO meeting is all about




          You'll only find out after the meeting happens, from the given context, it's not too clear.




          The hiring manager wrote explicitly that this was unusual procedure for them, but that hey "had bad luck with employees in the past". However, upon request, he also told me that they had no doubts that I would be qualified for the position.




          I believe this happens for either of two reasons:




          • The Hiring manager is trying to get an explicit approval from CEO for your joining (and terms and condition) because it might have happened that both the earlier engineers who left were hired by this very hiring manager and this time he is trying to convince the CEO that is is not because of him that the conflicts happened at a later time.


          • The CEO wants to ensure that you take the job, because they think you are a fit for the job, maybe they don't have much options and the CEO wants to add a "personal touch" to the interaction so as you are more inclined to accept the job offer.




          If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to make sure everything is OK with the company?




          First ask yourself - do you have answers to all the questions you need to know? Are you satisfied with the "guided tour" and organization policies? Are you finally OK with working in that environment (people, policies and tools)? Are you satisfied with the compensation and remuneration proposed?



          To sum is up: ask anything, just anything you want to know.






          share|improve this answer
















          I'm not sure what this CEO meeting is all about




          You'll only find out after the meeting happens, from the given context, it's not too clear.




          The hiring manager wrote explicitly that this was unusual procedure for them, but that hey "had bad luck with employees in the past". However, upon request, he also told me that they had no doubts that I would be qualified for the position.




          I believe this happens for either of two reasons:




          • The Hiring manager is trying to get an explicit approval from CEO for your joining (and terms and condition) because it might have happened that both the earlier engineers who left were hired by this very hiring manager and this time he is trying to convince the CEO that is is not because of him that the conflicts happened at a later time.


          • The CEO wants to ensure that you take the job, because they think you are a fit for the job, maybe they don't have much options and the CEO wants to add a "personal touch" to the interaction so as you are more inclined to accept the job offer.




          If the CEO meeting is going to happen, what questions should I ask, to make sure everything is OK with the company?




          First ask yourself - do you have answers to all the questions you need to know? Are you satisfied with the "guided tour" and organization policies? Are you finally OK with working in that environment (people, policies and tools)? Are you satisfied with the compensation and remuneration proposed?



          To sum is up: ask anything, just anything you want to know.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 10 hours ago

























          answered 13 hours ago









          Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh

          3,15811430




          3,15811430























              10














              While it may be unusual, it is not necessarily a bad sign. Stranger things have happened without anything negative happening.



              At a previous job of mine, there was a famous story about one guy. During his first day at work he asked for permission to go to the pharmacy, permission was granted, he left and he never returned.



              After this kind of experience, a company may adjust some of their procedures.



              Just look at the situation overall:




              • Is everything OK?


              • Are there other red flags?


              • Do you really want to work there?


              • Do you have other questions which you did not ask? (about frameworks, tools, deadlines, staff...). This would be a good opportunity to ask those question. Do not be afraid to ask questions.



              You may even ask for some details about the guy who quit during the previous year. Even make a joke, imply that you may want to quit also, in similar conditions.



              If they are friendly and the corporate culture is good, everything will be fine. If not, you may learn a lesson.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Did he mean to take permission to work at a pharmacy or buy some medicine? Strange. I don't know why someone would need permission to go to a pharmacy. You either go or inform and then go.

                – Sufian
                11 hours ago






              • 2





                The company was IT - where he just started to work. Since it was during work-hours, he had to ask permission - it was merely a formality, the work environment was very friendly, and several pharmacies were available within a 5-minute walk. He claimed he wanted to buy some medicine (something irrelevant, maybe aspirin). Why ask permission? It is strictly related to the rules of the company (maybe laws also, safety related) - but ultimately, it is just polite to do that.

                – virolino
                11 hours ago
















              10














              While it may be unusual, it is not necessarily a bad sign. Stranger things have happened without anything negative happening.



              At a previous job of mine, there was a famous story about one guy. During his first day at work he asked for permission to go to the pharmacy, permission was granted, he left and he never returned.



              After this kind of experience, a company may adjust some of their procedures.



              Just look at the situation overall:




              • Is everything OK?


              • Are there other red flags?


              • Do you really want to work there?


              • Do you have other questions which you did not ask? (about frameworks, tools, deadlines, staff...). This would be a good opportunity to ask those question. Do not be afraid to ask questions.



              You may even ask for some details about the guy who quit during the previous year. Even make a joke, imply that you may want to quit also, in similar conditions.



              If they are friendly and the corporate culture is good, everything will be fine. If not, you may learn a lesson.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Did he mean to take permission to work at a pharmacy or buy some medicine? Strange. I don't know why someone would need permission to go to a pharmacy. You either go or inform and then go.

                – Sufian
                11 hours ago






              • 2





                The company was IT - where he just started to work. Since it was during work-hours, he had to ask permission - it was merely a formality, the work environment was very friendly, and several pharmacies were available within a 5-minute walk. He claimed he wanted to buy some medicine (something irrelevant, maybe aspirin). Why ask permission? It is strictly related to the rules of the company (maybe laws also, safety related) - but ultimately, it is just polite to do that.

                – virolino
                11 hours ago














              10












              10








              10







              While it may be unusual, it is not necessarily a bad sign. Stranger things have happened without anything negative happening.



              At a previous job of mine, there was a famous story about one guy. During his first day at work he asked for permission to go to the pharmacy, permission was granted, he left and he never returned.



              After this kind of experience, a company may adjust some of their procedures.



              Just look at the situation overall:




              • Is everything OK?


              • Are there other red flags?


              • Do you really want to work there?


              • Do you have other questions which you did not ask? (about frameworks, tools, deadlines, staff...). This would be a good opportunity to ask those question. Do not be afraid to ask questions.



              You may even ask for some details about the guy who quit during the previous year. Even make a joke, imply that you may want to quit also, in similar conditions.



              If they are friendly and the corporate culture is good, everything will be fine. If not, you may learn a lesson.






              share|improve this answer













              While it may be unusual, it is not necessarily a bad sign. Stranger things have happened without anything negative happening.



              At a previous job of mine, there was a famous story about one guy. During his first day at work he asked for permission to go to the pharmacy, permission was granted, he left and he never returned.



              After this kind of experience, a company may adjust some of their procedures.



              Just look at the situation overall:




              • Is everything OK?


              • Are there other red flags?


              • Do you really want to work there?


              • Do you have other questions which you did not ask? (about frameworks, tools, deadlines, staff...). This would be a good opportunity to ask those question. Do not be afraid to ask questions.



              You may even ask for some details about the guy who quit during the previous year. Even make a joke, imply that you may want to quit also, in similar conditions.



              If they are friendly and the corporate culture is good, everything will be fine. If not, you may learn a lesson.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 14 hours ago









              virolinovirolino

              88913




              88913













              • Did he mean to take permission to work at a pharmacy or buy some medicine? Strange. I don't know why someone would need permission to go to a pharmacy. You either go or inform and then go.

                – Sufian
                11 hours ago






              • 2





                The company was IT - where he just started to work. Since it was during work-hours, he had to ask permission - it was merely a formality, the work environment was very friendly, and several pharmacies were available within a 5-minute walk. He claimed he wanted to buy some medicine (something irrelevant, maybe aspirin). Why ask permission? It is strictly related to the rules of the company (maybe laws also, safety related) - but ultimately, it is just polite to do that.

                – virolino
                11 hours ago



















              • Did he mean to take permission to work at a pharmacy or buy some medicine? Strange. I don't know why someone would need permission to go to a pharmacy. You either go or inform and then go.

                – Sufian
                11 hours ago






              • 2





                The company was IT - where he just started to work. Since it was during work-hours, he had to ask permission - it was merely a formality, the work environment was very friendly, and several pharmacies were available within a 5-minute walk. He claimed he wanted to buy some medicine (something irrelevant, maybe aspirin). Why ask permission? It is strictly related to the rules of the company (maybe laws also, safety related) - but ultimately, it is just polite to do that.

                – virolino
                11 hours ago

















              Did he mean to take permission to work at a pharmacy or buy some medicine? Strange. I don't know why someone would need permission to go to a pharmacy. You either go or inform and then go.

              – Sufian
              11 hours ago





              Did he mean to take permission to work at a pharmacy or buy some medicine? Strange. I don't know why someone would need permission to go to a pharmacy. You either go or inform and then go.

              – Sufian
              11 hours ago




              2




              2





              The company was IT - where he just started to work. Since it was during work-hours, he had to ask permission - it was merely a formality, the work environment was very friendly, and several pharmacies were available within a 5-minute walk. He claimed he wanted to buy some medicine (something irrelevant, maybe aspirin). Why ask permission? It is strictly related to the rules of the company (maybe laws also, safety related) - but ultimately, it is just polite to do that.

              – virolino
              11 hours ago





              The company was IT - where he just started to work. Since it was during work-hours, he had to ask permission - it was merely a formality, the work environment was very friendly, and several pharmacies were available within a 5-minute walk. He claimed he wanted to buy some medicine (something irrelevant, maybe aspirin). Why ask permission? It is strictly related to the rules of the company (maybe laws also, safety related) - but ultimately, it is just polite to do that.

              – virolino
              11 hours ago











              3














              Because the last person left when they refused to use the tools / framework it would be worth finding out if the other people who left went for the same reason.



              If you have no problem working with old / unusual tech then it may not be an issue for you.



              I think I'd also be asking to see a copy of the contract before handing in my notice with my current employer in case there's any show stoppers in there.






              share|improve this answer




























                3














                Because the last person left when they refused to use the tools / framework it would be worth finding out if the other people who left went for the same reason.



                If you have no problem working with old / unusual tech then it may not be an issue for you.



                I think I'd also be asking to see a copy of the contract before handing in my notice with my current employer in case there's any show stoppers in there.






                share|improve this answer


























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  Because the last person left when they refused to use the tools / framework it would be worth finding out if the other people who left went for the same reason.



                  If you have no problem working with old / unusual tech then it may not be an issue for you.



                  I think I'd also be asking to see a copy of the contract before handing in my notice with my current employer in case there's any show stoppers in there.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Because the last person left when they refused to use the tools / framework it would be worth finding out if the other people who left went for the same reason.



                  If you have no problem working with old / unusual tech then it may not be an issue for you.



                  I think I'd also be asking to see a copy of the contract before handing in my notice with my current employer in case there's any show stoppers in there.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 14 hours ago









                  Old NickOld Nick

                  5245




                  5245






















                      cmonk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      cmonk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      cmonk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      cmonk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129380%2fis-bad-luck-with-former-employees-a-red-flag%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown











                      Popular posts from this blog

                      what is the purpose of having a “thru cal” on RF PCB?

                      What does Gandalf whisper to the Moth on the Orthanc in Isengard?

                      magento2 creating a lot of catalogrule_product_temp tables