Is Ruth Bader Ginsburg alive?
Right wing sources on social media have been abuzz with rumors that Ginsburg has died. The conspiracy theory is that Democrats are hiding her death to avoid another Trump pick on the Supreme Court. There's even a hashtag on Twitter for this conspiracy theory, #WheresRuth.
Yesterday The Washington Post ran a story claiming Ginsburg had attended a performance celebrating her. However, the paper featured no hard evidence that she was there and far-right sources claimed the story was fabricated.
While I strongly believe that this is another Pizzagate- or Q-esque invention, is there any hard evidence that Ginsburg is still alive?
politics mortality celebrities
asked 8 hours ago
Solomonoff's SecretSolomonoff's Secret
1154
New contributor
Solomonoff's Secret is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Right wing sources on social media have been abuzz with rumors that Ginsburg has died. The conspiracy theory is that Democrats are hiding her death to avoid another Trump pick on the Supreme Court. There's even a hashtag on Twitter for this conspiracy theory, #WheresRuth.
Yesterday The Washington Post ran a story claiming Ginsburg had attended a performance celebrating her. However, the paper featured no hard evidence that she was there and far-right sources claimed the story was fabricated.
While I strongly believe that this is another Pizzagate- or Q-esque invention, is there any hard evidence that Ginsburg is still alive?
politics mortality celebrities
asked 8 hours ago
Solomonoff's SecretSolomonoff's Secret
1154
New contributor
Solomonoff's Secret is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
8
It's an implausible theory. In order for a coverup to have a salutary effect, it needs to be maintained long enough. In this case, the hypothetical coverup would have to last until the Senate majority changes, about two years from now at minimum.
– elliot svensson
7 hours ago
4
@elliotsvensson It would also require the willing participation of the conservative wing of the court, which seems... unlikely.
– ceejayoz
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Right wing sources on social media have been abuzz with rumors that Ginsburg has died. The conspiracy theory is that Democrats are hiding her death to avoid another Trump pick on the Supreme Court. There's even a hashtag on Twitter for this conspiracy theory, #WheresRuth.
Yesterday The Washington Post ran a story claiming Ginsburg had attended a performance celebrating her. However, the paper featured no hard evidence that she was there and far-right sources claimed the story was fabricated.
While I strongly believe that this is another Pizzagate- or Q-esque invention, is there any hard evidence that Ginsburg is still alive?
politics mortality celebrities
asked 8 hours ago
Solomonoff's SecretSolomonoff's Secret
1154
New contributor
Solomonoff's Secret is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Right wing sources on social media have been abuzz with rumors that Ginsburg has died. The conspiracy theory is that Democrats are hiding her death to avoid another Trump pick on the Supreme Court. There's even a hashtag on Twitter for this conspiracy theory, #WheresRuth.
Yesterday The Washington Post ran a story claiming Ginsburg had attended a performance celebrating her. However, the paper featured no hard evidence that she was there and far-right sources claimed the story was fabricated.
While I strongly believe that this is another Pizzagate- or Q-esque invention, is there any hard evidence that Ginsburg is still alive?
politics mortality celebrities
politics mortality celebrities
asked 8 hours ago
Solomonoff's SecretSolomonoff's Secret
1154
New contributor
Solomonoff's Secret is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
Solomonoff's SecretSolomonoff's Secret
1154
New contributor
Solomonoff's Secret is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
Solomonoff's SecretSolomonoff's Secret
1154
New contributor
Solomonoff's Secret is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
Solomonoff's SecretSolomonoff's Secret
1154
asked 8 hours ago
Solomonoff's SecretSolomonoff's Secret
1154
1154
New contributor
Solomonoff's Secret is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Solomonoff's Secret is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Solomonoff's Secret is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
8
It's an implausible theory. In order for a coverup to have a salutary effect, it needs to be maintained long enough. In this case, the hypothetical coverup would have to last until the Senate majority changes, about two years from now at minimum.
– elliot svensson
7 hours ago
4
@elliotsvensson It would also require the willing participation of the conservative wing of the court, which seems... unlikely.
– ceejayoz
4 hours ago
add a comment |
8
It's an implausible theory. In order for a coverup to have a salutary effect, it needs to be maintained long enough. In this case, the hypothetical coverup would have to last until the Senate majority changes, about two years from now at minimum.
– elliot svensson
7 hours ago
4
@elliotsvensson It would also require the willing participation of the conservative wing of the court, which seems... unlikely.
– ceejayoz
4 hours ago
8
8
It's an implausible theory. In order for a coverup to have a salutary effect, it needs to be maintained long enough. In this case, the hypothetical coverup would have to last until the Senate majority changes, about two years from now at minimum.
– elliot svensson
7 hours ago
It's an implausible theory. In order for a coverup to have a salutary effect, it needs to be maintained long enough. In this case, the hypothetical coverup would have to last until the Senate majority changes, about two years from now at minimum.
– elliot svensson
7 hours ago
4
4
@elliotsvensson It would also require the willing participation of the conservative wing of the court, which seems... unlikely.
– ceejayoz
4 hours ago
@elliotsvensson It would also require the willing participation of the conservative wing of the court, which seems... unlikely.
– ceejayoz
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In this article by the well-respected Associated Press, we read of a concert that Justice Ginsburg attended Monday night (Feb 5, 2019), her first public appearance since surgery in New York on December 21, 2018.
The justice sat in the back of the darkened auditorium at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. The National Constitution Center, which sponsored the concert, did not permit photography.
Justice Ginsburg's son James Ginsburg said that "his mother is walking a mile a day and meeting with her personal trainer twice a week."
answered 8 hours ago
elliot svenssonelliot svensson
2,161534
4
I must say — as facially ludicrous as sensible people know the idea that a Supreme Court justice is dead but some conspiracy is suppressing the truth to be — that article is far from dispositive. Someone, unnamed, claims to have seen the Justice in a darkened room where photography was forbidden. If there was a report that Elvis had been spotted under those circumstances, you wouldn't even bother to investigate.
– Malvolio
3 hours ago
7
What does this answer add above the evidence alluded to in the question, which the op already found insufficient?
– Hasse1987
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In this article by the well-respected Associated Press, we read of a concert that Justice Ginsburg attended Monday night (Feb 5, 2019), her first public appearance since surgery in New York on December 21, 2018.
The justice sat in the back of the darkened auditorium at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. The National Constitution Center, which sponsored the concert, did not permit photography.
Justice Ginsburg's son James Ginsburg said that "his mother is walking a mile a day and meeting with her personal trainer twice a week."
answered 8 hours ago
elliot svenssonelliot svensson
2,161534
4
I must say — as facially ludicrous as sensible people know the idea that a Supreme Court justice is dead but some conspiracy is suppressing the truth to be — that article is far from dispositive. Someone, unnamed, claims to have seen the Justice in a darkened room where photography was forbidden. If there was a report that Elvis had been spotted under those circumstances, you wouldn't even bother to investigate.
– Malvolio
3 hours ago
7
What does this answer add above the evidence alluded to in the question, which the op already found insufficient?
– Hasse1987
2 hours ago
add a comment |
In this article by the well-respected Associated Press, we read of a concert that Justice Ginsburg attended Monday night (Feb 5, 2019), her first public appearance since surgery in New York on December 21, 2018.
The justice sat in the back of the darkened auditorium at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. The National Constitution Center, which sponsored the concert, did not permit photography.
Justice Ginsburg's son James Ginsburg said that "his mother is walking a mile a day and meeting with her personal trainer twice a week."
answered 8 hours ago
elliot svenssonelliot svensson
2,161534
4
I must say — as facially ludicrous as sensible people know the idea that a Supreme Court justice is dead but some conspiracy is suppressing the truth to be — that article is far from dispositive. Someone, unnamed, claims to have seen the Justice in a darkened room where photography was forbidden. If there was a report that Elvis had been spotted under those circumstances, you wouldn't even bother to investigate.
– Malvolio
3 hours ago
7
What does this answer add above the evidence alluded to in the question, which the op already found insufficient?
– Hasse1987
2 hours ago
add a comment |
In this article by the well-respected Associated Press, we read of a concert that Justice Ginsburg attended Monday night (Feb 5, 2019), her first public appearance since surgery in New York on December 21, 2018.
The justice sat in the back of the darkened auditorium at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. The National Constitution Center, which sponsored the concert, did not permit photography.
Justice Ginsburg's son James Ginsburg said that "his mother is walking a mile a day and meeting with her personal trainer twice a week."
answered 8 hours ago
elliot svenssonelliot svensson
2,161534
In this article by the well-respected Associated Press, we read of a concert that Justice Ginsburg attended Monday night (Feb 5, 2019), her first public appearance since surgery in New York on December 21, 2018.
The justice sat in the back of the darkened auditorium at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. The National Constitution Center, which sponsored the concert, did not permit photography.
Justice Ginsburg's son James Ginsburg said that "his mother is walking a mile a day and meeting with her personal trainer twice a week."
answered 8 hours ago
elliot svenssonelliot svensson
2,161534
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
elliot svenssonelliot svensson
2,161534
answered 8 hours ago
elliot svenssonelliot svensson
2,161534
answered 8 hours ago
elliot svenssonelliot svensson
2,161534
2,161534
4
I must say — as facially ludicrous as sensible people know the idea that a Supreme Court justice is dead but some conspiracy is suppressing the truth to be — that article is far from dispositive. Someone, unnamed, claims to have seen the Justice in a darkened room where photography was forbidden. If there was a report that Elvis had been spotted under those circumstances, you wouldn't even bother to investigate.
– Malvolio
3 hours ago
7
What does this answer add above the evidence alluded to in the question, which the op already found insufficient?
– Hasse1987
2 hours ago
add a comment |
4
I must say — as facially ludicrous as sensible people know the idea that a Supreme Court justice is dead but some conspiracy is suppressing the truth to be — that article is far from dispositive. Someone, unnamed, claims to have seen the Justice in a darkened room where photography was forbidden. If there was a report that Elvis had been spotted under those circumstances, you wouldn't even bother to investigate.
– Malvolio
3 hours ago
7
What does this answer add above the evidence alluded to in the question, which the op already found insufficient?
– Hasse1987
2 hours ago
4
4
I must say — as facially ludicrous as sensible people know the idea that a Supreme Court justice is dead but some conspiracy is suppressing the truth to be — that article is far from dispositive. Someone, unnamed, claims to have seen the Justice in a darkened room where photography was forbidden. If there was a report that Elvis had been spotted under those circumstances, you wouldn't even bother to investigate.
– Malvolio
3 hours ago
I must say — as facially ludicrous as sensible people know the idea that a Supreme Court justice is dead but some conspiracy is suppressing the truth to be — that article is far from dispositive. Someone, unnamed, claims to have seen the Justice in a darkened room where photography was forbidden. If there was a report that Elvis had been spotted under those circumstances, you wouldn't even bother to investigate.
– Malvolio
3 hours ago
7
7
What does this answer add above the evidence alluded to in the question, which the op already found insufficient?
– Hasse1987
2 hours ago
What does this answer add above the evidence alluded to in the question, which the op already found insufficient?
– Hasse1987
2 hours ago
add a comment |
8
It's an implausible theory. In order for a coverup to have a salutary effect, it needs to be maintained long enough. In this case, the hypothetical coverup would have to last until the Senate majority changes, about two years from now at minimum.
– elliot svensson
7 hours ago
4
@elliotsvensson It would also require the willing participation of the conservative wing of the court, which seems... unlikely.
– ceejayoz
4 hours ago